|
|
Post by CC on Apr 16, 2009 10:36:25 GMT -5
Those three guys?
Why I am not surprised lol
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Apr 16, 2009 10:42:04 GMT -5
Uh, actually, I only listed McDyess as my #1 because I already have ET and I needed a big man badly... Kidd overall is the #1 player in this class regardless of need. If I had a big man instead of ET, I OBVIOUSLY would have gone Kidd over anyone else. I mean, a rookie with A- handling? Come on, that's absolute beast. But I'm extremely excited to have gotten McDyess, a big man finally. |
|
|
|
Post by theschmaranz on Apr 16, 2009 10:52:38 GMT -5
Uh, actually, I only listed McDyess as my #1 because I already have ET and I needed a big man badly... Kidd overall is the #1 player in this class regardless of need. If I had a big man instead of ET, I OBVIOUSLY would have gone Kidd over anyone else. I mean, a rookie with A- handling? Come on, that's absolute beast. But I'm extremely excited to have gotten McDyess, a big man finally. Really though, if you wind up getting the #1 pick and would use it for need over taking the best possible player, you should just trade the pick for something crazy instead. And the Kidd at #1, I agree with people that say it may have been a mistake. I've been in FBB leagues for a long time and have never seen a Kidd type carry a team to a title. The same can't be said about a McDyess or Hill. |
|
|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Apr 16, 2009 10:55:01 GMT -5
1. Hill
2. Kidd
3. Dyess
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Apr 16, 2009 10:56:54 GMT -5
Uh, actually, I only listed McDyess as my #1 because I already have ET and I needed a big man badly... Kidd overall is the #1 player in this class regardless of need. If I had a big man instead of ET, I OBVIOUSLY would have gone Kidd over anyone else. I mean, a rookie with A- handling? Come on, that's absolute beast. But I'm extremely excited to have gotten McDyess, a big man finally. You're such a liar. You IMed me and I said I was interested in taking Grant Hill and you said "Damn, yeah me too man, I really want Hill I'm going to play him at PF" I knew you were just trying to convince me to take Hill over someone else you wanted. Let's be real. Yes, because what Kidd has done in other leagues is going to translate to UOSLR, brilliant thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by House on Apr 16, 2009 11:01:47 GMT -5
Uh, actually, I only listed McDyess as my #1 because I already have ET and I needed a big man badly... Kidd overall is the #1 player in this class regardless of need. If I had a big man instead of ET, I OBVIOUSLY would have gone Kidd over anyone else. I mean, a rookie with A- handling? Come on, that's absolute beast. But I'm extremely excited to have gotten McDyess, a big man finally. You're such a liar. You IMed me and I said I was interested in taking Grant Hill and you said "Damn, yeah me too man, I really want Hill I'm going to play him at PF" I knew you were just trying to convince me to take Hill over someone else you wanted. Let's be real. Yes, because what Kidd has done in other leagues is going to translate to UOSLR, brilliant thinking. Dude, you even said it yourself: I was using reverse psychology there. Hill was the one guy I DIDN'T want. |
|
|
|
Post by House on Apr 16, 2009 11:03:22 GMT -5
Uh, actually, I only listed McDyess as my #1 because I already have ET and I needed a big man badly... Kidd overall is the #1 player in this class regardless of need. If I had a big man instead of ET, I OBVIOUSLY would have gone Kidd over anyone else. I mean, a rookie with A- handling? Come on, that's absolute beast. But I'm extremely excited to have gotten McDyess, a big man finally. Really though, if you wind up getting the #1 pick and would use it for need over taking the best possible player, you should just trade the pick for something crazy instead. And the Kidd at #1, I agree with people that say it may have been a mistake. I've been in FBB leagues for a long time and have never seen a Kidd type carry a team to a title. The same can't be said about a McDyess or Hill. In this case, I would have gone with need, partly because McDyess's ratings are so good, and partly because Dice is only 19. So he's (hopefully) got a boatload of potential. Kidd's ridiculous too. I do think he becomes the best PG in the league before long. |
|
|
|
Post by mops on Apr 16, 2009 12:01:14 GMT -5
Who said that? Those folks are hella dumb. idle, mops, and chipper would all take McDyess over Hill and Kidd. My top 3 would have gone. Hill Dice Kidd I have Brandon right now and dont have a good PF. Getting Hill I could move Robinson over to PF, or Dice slides in. |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 16, 2009 12:06:11 GMT -5
1. Kidd
2. Dyess
3. Hill
That's my top 3. Kidd is the best player in this draft, regardless of need.
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on Apr 16, 2009 12:24:40 GMT -5
Who's up?
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 16, 2009 12:26:04 GMT -5
lets get this draft done.
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on Apr 16, 2009 12:30:26 GMT -5
No kidding.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Apr 16, 2009 12:37:19 GMT -5
how long do people have to pick? It has been 8.5 hours and the Lakers were signed on when they were #5 in the que.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 16, 2009 12:37:52 GMT -5
sim the motherfucker
|
|
|
|
Post by gp on Apr 16, 2009 12:54:04 GMT -5
Nice for the Hawks. McDyess looks scary. ^ last post from that dude. then we still gotta wait for mike. |
|
