|
|
Post by ashes on May 5, 2009 0:44:48 GMT -5
Read his real numbers. That's what he did.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 5, 2009 0:46:05 GMT -5
Read his real numbers. That's what he did. I know that now, I screwed up and took his per 36 stats as his career stats....that did seem a bit high in hindsight |
|
|
|
Post by House on May 5, 2009 0:46:29 GMT -5
Interesting class.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on May 5, 2009 15:44:18 GMT -5
Wow, what a poor class up top. Next year's draft is going to be stupidly loaded.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 5, 2009 15:45:53 GMT -5
Wow, what a poor class up top. Next year's draft is going to be stupidly loaded.  |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 5, 2009 15:47:01 GMT -5
AD was a very serviceable player at one point. better then most players in this draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on May 5, 2009 15:47:24 GMT -5
I inherit a team with no talent, end up managing to get two extra picks in my first draft... and bleh. The good thing is we'll still suck next year because no draftee this year will make us any better  |
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 5, 2009 15:48:33 GMT -5
#13 pick...sigh...
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 5, 2009 17:31:56 GMT -5
I inherit a team with no talent, end up managing to get two extra picks in my first draft... and bleh. The good thing is we'll still suck next year because no draftee this year will make us any better You're projected to have at least a top 5 pick and you don't think a draftee will make you better? Weird. How w-esque. |
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on May 6, 2009 6:39:17 GMT -5
I inherit a team with no talent, end up managing to get two extra picks in my first draft... and bleh. The good thing is we'll still suck next year because no draftee this year will make us any better You're projected to have at least a top 5 pick and you don't think a draftee will make you better? Weird. How w-esque. I just meant that whichever player I draft won't be good enough to get us out of a top 5 pick IMO for next season too. I can't see it happening with the talent in this draft. And sure, in the NBA, the 95 and 97 drafts were very weak compared to the 96 draft which was fully loaded, but I expected that you'd try and disperse the talent a little more evenly among these three drafts seeing as you have creative control of them. It's cool though, you get weak drafts and you get strong drafts. This draft seems to be quite deep with mid-level talent, but up top there's no superstar talents (imo) compared with years to come and I think KG would've been a perfect fit in this draft. Going back to my original point, let's say it was 96 instead, and I could draft an Iverson, or a Kobe, Ray Ray, Camby, Starbury, Steve Nash (and now a KG) etc etc... any one of those players would vastly improve my team compared to the likes of say a Big Z, Sheed, Stack... Thanks for finishing the draft file though, it's much appreciated. I was just making a "constructive criticism" style comment (no offense intended). |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 6, 2009 8:17:34 GMT -5
Lol who cares about Antonio Davis? He was drafted in 1990. Plus he's garbage. I guess if it makes you happy he can go in FA. actually...he played overseas until 93 when the Pacers signed him. He was a great big man off the bench and when he went to Toronto he was a top 10 center for a couple years. It would make me happy ;D Actually... he was still drafted in 1990, regardless of what year he came to play in the NBA. Just like a lot of other people do... especially Europeans. Why hasn't anyone said anything about that statement ? hahahahahahahahha |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 6, 2009 9:38:23 GMT -5
You're projected to have at least a top 5 pick and you don't think a draftee will make you better? Weird. How w-esque. I just meant that whichever player I draft won't be good enough to get us out of a top 5 pick IMO for next season too. I can't see it happening with the talent in this draft. And sure, in the NBA, the 95 and 97 drafts were very weak compared to the 96 draft which was fully loaded, but I expected that you'd try and disperse the talent a little more evenly among these three drafts seeing as you have creative control of them. It's cool though, you get weak drafts and you get strong drafts. This draft seems to be quite deep with mid-level talent, but up top there's no superstar talents (imo) compared with years to come and I think KG would've been a perfect fit in this draft. Going back to my original point, let's say it was 96 instead, and I could draft an Iverson, or a Kobe, Ray Ray, Camby, Starbury, Steve Nash (and now a KG) etc etc... any one of those players would vastly improve my team compared to the likes of say a Big Z, Sheed, Stack... Thanks for finishing the draft file though, it's much appreciated. I was just making a "constructive criticism" style comment (no offense intended). Hmm. Maybe you shouldn't bank on underclassmen.  |
|
