|
|
Post by Andrew on May 9, 2009 1:50:32 GMT -5
so according to you....a copy and pasted article from Wikipedia is equal to a draft review that showed 10x more effort |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on May 9, 2009 1:55:59 GMT -5
My brother is retarded, face it.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on May 9, 2009 2:10:59 GMT -5
so according to you....a copy and pasted article from Wikipedia is equal to a draft review that showed 10x more effort  |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on May 9, 2009 4:08:48 GMT -5
so according to you....a copy and pasted article from Wikipedia is equal to a draft review that showed 10x more effort I did do the first part lol. |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on May 9, 2009 4:14:11 GMT -5
Plus over all I got a 0
|
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on May 9, 2009 4:18:51 GMT -5
so according to you....a copy and pasted article from Wikipedia is equal to a draft review that showed 10x more effort Over all he was just being nice because he know as everyone else knows its getting a 0 just like it should. Plus the draft review was boring. Not saying that my is not boring seeing that it is but both are boring articles. I mean when we vote on this are we voting on how long they are or how good they are. Are we voting on how long it took to read or how much we liked reading it. |
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 9, 2009 9:18:34 GMT -5
I gave it a 3.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on May 9, 2009 14:52:12 GMT -5
I gave your a 3 too  |
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on May 10, 2009 23:11:27 GMT -5
that shits hilarious
9 0 point respnses
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 12, 2009 13:35:29 GMT -5
I wish I wouldve continued to miss this one.
|
|
