|
|
Post by kobe24 on Oct 10, 2009 22:32:08 GMT -5
Warriors Get:
Michael Olowokandi
Chris Andersen
Leon Smith
Mavericks 2001 Second
Mavericks 2002 First
Bucks 2005 First
Bucks 2006 First
Mavericks Get:
Shareef Abdur-Rahim
Damon Stoudamire
Roberto Bergersen
Lee Mayberry
I accept, didn't expect to deal Kandi so quickly, but I really like this for me. SAR is 2 years younger than Kandi and is on a awesome contract and a better player IMO. Bucks look like they are set for the future, so those firsts should be fine. Hoping to win this year, so hopefully my first isnt good.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Oct 10, 2009 22:32:45 GMT -5
Both Bucks picks are owed to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Oct 10, 2009 22:32:54 GMT -5
I agree
To me Kandi = Reef and Damon is well worth all of the cap space I get, three 1sts and two okay prospects.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Oct 10, 2009 22:35:29 GMT -5
Absolutely hate this for the Warriors. Mavs totally own here. Especially since they are getting Webber.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Oct 10, 2009 22:36:09 GMT -5
Especially if the Warriors whiff on any big FAs. If they get a big FA, then alright, this is pretty good. If not...
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 10, 2009 22:52:45 GMT -5
I view it as Damon for two firsts and cap, and Kandi Man and a first for Shareef not bad value at all.I think Kandi is better than Shareef, and GSW have a few PG's too many
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Oct 10, 2009 22:56:12 GMT -5
Damon put up 16, 6, 10 last year. Worth more than two firsts that aren't projected to be that great and some cap. Kandi and SAR are pretty close. But SAR has the age and the contract over him. Kandi could have a good TC though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Oct 10, 2009 23:00:39 GMT -5
Precisely why I drafted Wagner  |
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Oct 10, 2009 23:02:47 GMT -5
Precisely why I drafted Wagner eh? |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Oct 10, 2009 23:07:38 GMT -5
With a core of Arenas and Wagner there was no long term need for either Childress or Mighty Mouse which he could dangle as trade bait for a big man. He could have done something smaller like Mighty Mouse for Kandi almost straight up. Arenas, Wagner, SAR, Swift, Kandi would have been damn good. Now its... Arenas, Childress,  , Swift, Kandi with Chandler to the bench. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 10, 2009 23:09:46 GMT -5
I like it for both sides. Mouse has always been underrated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 10, 2009 23:44:00 GMT -5
Damon put up 16, 6, 10 last year. Worth more than two firsts that aren't projected to be that great and some cap. Kandi and SAR are pretty close. But SAR has the age and the contract over him. Kandi could have a good TC though. In no way was I saying that Damon is not worth that money, to the Warriors however, he really isn't worth that contract, as they have Gilbert Arenas and Randolph Childress. |
|
|
|
Post by aar on Oct 11, 2009 1:28:46 GMT -5
I'm glad that people don't think I got destroyed on this trade.
Chipper made it seem like the Titanic just sank on AIM
SAR puts up great numbers on my lousy team - he is a solid, unspectacular player.
Looking at Kandi's TOPG, FG% and his consistent growth, I think that he will be better than SAR long term and more valuable.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Oct 11, 2009 1:34:52 GMT -5
The Titanic DID sink, you know.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Oct 11, 2009 1:44:31 GMT -5
Nice trading by the Mavs. Glad to see a new GM actually not getting it in the butt for once.
|
|
