|
|
Post by House on Oct 13, 2009 12:29:03 GMT -5
Hawks trade:
Jerald Honeycutt
Stephen Hunter
2003 Hawks first
Warriors trade:
Michael Olowakandi
Torraye Braggs
Vet FA (Shawn Bradley would be awesome, thanks)
I accept. It's a risk, but my goal is to be better next year, hopefully I can do that. Honeycutt's great, but I REALLY like Olowakandi as a big man going forward at center for me. I hopefully have another move up my sleeve later on today.
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Oct 13, 2009 12:31:32 GMT -5
Cut Jason Collier to sign the vet FA
I agree
I am a big fan of what Honeycutt brings to a team - he's a stellar defensive player and gets points on offensive boards
Steven Hunter had a really nice TC - any time a guy goes from C to C+ rebounding on his first TC, it means that he has upside.
The pick is a nice added bonus.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Oct 13, 2009 12:32:21 GMT -5
olowakandi sucks... honeycutt is overpaid but he's better than any shit you give up
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Oct 13, 2009 12:33:05 GMT -5
Really? We'll see. I actually am starting to really like what Olowakandi could do to a team like mine, even if he's 26 coming off a rookie contract. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Oct 13, 2009 12:36:23 GMT -5
Nice deal for the Hawks
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Oct 13, 2009 12:38:48 GMT -5
Thanks, Deebs.
Yeah, didn't want to have to deal with losing Honeycutt after only two years, so I went with the Kandi Man instead.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Oct 13, 2009 12:41:55 GMT -5
Thanks, Deebs. Yeah, didn't want to have to deal with losing Honeycutt after only two years, so I went with the Kandi Man instead. so you'd rather deal with losing Kandi Man after one year instead of Honeycutt for two? That makes sense! Loyalty: 2 <----------- Greed: 35 Play For Winner: 21 Good luck with that. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 13, 2009 12:42:42 GMT -5
Thanks, Deebs. Yeah, didn't want to have to deal with losing Honeycutt after only two years, so I went with the Kandi Man instead. Probably more of a chance you lose Kandi, lmao |
|
|
|
Post by House on Oct 13, 2009 12:45:12 GMT -5
Honeycutt not having Birds= reasoning there.  |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 13, 2009 12:46:43 GMT -5
You can offer 120% of previous contract for however many years, birds don't matter with a contract that big.
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Oct 13, 2009 12:47:25 GMT -5
Honeycutt not having Birds= reasoning there. Honeycutt without birds is still a $12 mil. or so starting contract |
|
|
|
Post by House on Oct 13, 2009 12:51:39 GMT -5
Either way, I like Kandi more.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Oct 13, 2009 12:53:15 GMT -5
either way still a bad deal
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Oct 13, 2009 15:21:59 GMT -5
I'm gonna start calling Kandi man the blunt man. His 3rd team this offseason. Why does no one want him?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 13, 2009 15:23:26 GMT -5
I like Honeycutt more than Kandi so...
|
|
