|
Post by ashes on Oct 21, 2009 12:33:46 GMT -5
Dude that sucks! Now you can get one with a quad-core processor and pretty good graphics card. And it's a 27'' display! You see, I'm torn now. Firstly I'm pissed off because this is a newer model, and I love all the specs and everything and the quad-core etc etc... BUT, and here's why this morning I'm OK with it: The 24 inch top of the range iMac we currently have is actually more than we've needed. We haven't actually needed the extra power at all, even with Logic. The 27 inch top of the range specs are beastly, but 27 inch?! That's humongous! To be honest, the 24 is actually too big for our study! When it arrived and we set it up, it was actually stupidly large because there's not enough distance between the screen and where we sit. And in actual fact, it can't be changed. The way our study is set up, the computer has to be where it is and we have to sit where we sit. It's a really small study and we have the piano, bokshelves, desks etc etc to fit in there and in all honesty, the 27 inch would really have been too big. 21 would've been perfect, but you can't quad-core the new 21. When I told my gf the new iMacs were out, she literally took one look and blew it off. She really has her common sense hat because she just said it like it is. 27 inch screen is just too big, meaning the only option for us would've been the 21 inch. But what we have now is already better and there are no problems with what we have, at all. And it's true. I just had my "I want the latest product" hat on instead of the comon sense one lol. The only thing I really love about the new one that I wish we had is the Magic Mouse, because I'm not so hot on the Mighty Mouse to be honest. Having said that, at the price the Magic Mouse is going for over here... fuck it! I'll just stick with my MacBook multi-touch pad lol. 27'' isn't too big, don't be a wiener! new iMac cockslaps the old one
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 21, 2009 12:34:18 GMT -5
too bad I'm short the 2K!
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 21, 2009 12:37:26 GMT -5
Tiger has a lot of hats.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 21, 2009 13:06:31 GMT -5
true
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Oct 21, 2009 13:08:37 GMT -5
instead of spamming the boards do something and sim... you are terrible!
|
|
|
Post by mops on Oct 21, 2009 14:12:56 GMT -5
Gtfo marty
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Oct 21, 2009 14:14:59 GMT -5
Got the Sonics twice and the Grizz once this sim.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 21, 2009 14:16:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 21, 2009 14:17:28 GMT -5
You see, I'm torn now. Firstly I'm pissed off because this is a newer model, and I love all the specs and everything and the quad-core etc etc... BUT, and here's why this morning I'm OK with it: The 24 inch top of the range iMac we currently have is actually more than we've needed. We haven't actually needed the extra power at all, even with Logic. The 27 inch top of the range specs are beastly, but 27 inch?! That's humongous! To be honest, the 24 is actually too big for our study! When it arrived and we set it up, it was actually stupidly large because there's not enough distance between the screen and where we sit. And in actual fact, it can't be changed. The way our study is set up, the computer has to be where it is and we have to sit where we sit. It's a really small study and we have the piano, bokshelves, desks etc etc to fit in there and in all honesty, the 27 inch would really have been too big. 21 would've been perfect, but you can't quad-core the new 21. When I told my gf the new iMacs were out, she literally took one look and blew it off. She really has her common sense hat because she just said it like it is. 27 inch screen is just too big, meaning the only option for us would've been the 21 inch. But what we have now is already better and there are no problems with what we have, at all. And it's true. I just had my "I want the latest product" hat on instead of the comon sense one lol. The only thing I really love about the new one that I wish we had is the Magic Mouse, because I'm not so hot on the Mighty Mouse to be honest. Having said that, at the price the Magic Mouse is going for over here... fuck it! I'll just stick with my MacBook multi-touch pad lol. 27'' isn't too big, don't be a wiener! new iMac cockslaps the old one Mate, it's only 5 inches away from the size of our TV in the living room! A 27inch screen in our small study would be like sitting in the front row of a cinema. You just don't do it!
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 21, 2009 14:18:42 GMT -5
instead of spamming the boards do something and sim... you are terrible! LOL at how Raul scored that goal mate. ROFL! Also, last night, Barca lose (LOL), Liverpool lose (LOL) and Arsenal let two point slip in the last minute (LOL). We win today... all is good
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 21, 2009 14:19:11 GMT -5
too bad I'm short the 2K! It's kinda cheap too... but still, 27 is too much!!!
|
|
|
Post by mops on Oct 21, 2009 14:45:04 GMT -5
Was curious why Earl Watson won rookie of the year and why we won a few big games against better teams. Here is the averages for my two new guards through 8 games with me.
Watson- 16.8 ppg, 7.25 apg, 4.5 rpg. 1.75 topg, 1.87 spg Daniels- 19 ppg, 4.3 apg, 4.3 rpg, 1.5 topg, 0.87 spg
Basically it looks like Watson could be a stud down the road if he continues to progress. He can score at a good clip as the third option and gets a solid assists per game, but even more impressive is his assist to turnover ratio which is at 4-1 which is really good.
Daniels was my wildcard andfrom the early looks of it he could be worth the trade. With 19 ppg I never thought I'd get that from him. He did it against some good teams too boot. His assist and rebounds are solid for a sg but I wouldn't mind him cutting the turnovers down
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Oct 21, 2009 15:29:29 GMT -5
Yea, I didn't actually want to average it out since it was 10 am or something, but Watson has been balling since starting with yall
Lakers looking for a nice, healthy losing sim. Would be nice if the Blazers lost as well, but playing KG at the 3 seems to have given that team a new dimension
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 21, 2009 15:40:04 GMT -5
27'' isn't too big, don't be a wiener! new iMac cockslaps the old one Mate, it's only 5 inches away from the size of our TV in the living room! A 27inch screen in our small study would be like sitting in the front row of a cinema. You just don't do it! All I hear is "blah blah I'm a wiener blah blah"
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 21, 2009 15:40:57 GMT -5
too bad I'm short the 2K! It's kinda cheap too... but still, 27 is too much!!! Wire me the 2K brah I'll set up a payment plan for you and make Etienne Preira 21 again with A A A A A A ratings.
|
|