|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Oct 20, 2009 21:54:35 GMT -5
Nice to see VC make all 3rd team, great article.
|
|
|
|
Post by iflip on Oct 21, 2009 0:53:20 GMT -5
this league writes some great articles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Oct 21, 2009 1:10:31 GMT -5
great write up tiger
Miner getting a little recognition
|
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Oct 21, 2009 1:12:57 GMT -5
Damn, I love UOSLR Articles!! Great read Tiger!! |
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Oct 21, 2009 1:13:22 GMT -5
this league writes some great articles. |
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on Oct 21, 2009 7:50:23 GMT -5
Very interesting concept for an article and enjoyable read. Its also pretty ironic how 76ers and I have no selections but I can't say I disagree. I think in a different style of offense Grant Hill could put up better numbers but my offense is so spread that everyone gets touches. I tried to give your Bucks and the Sixers as much credit as I could. Great team chemistry for both teams, which is why you two have the best records in the East, but I may even have been a little generous by ranking JO and Hill at the top of the Honourable Mentions list at their position. No way Jermaine O'Neal > DRob... |
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 21, 2009 8:33:47 GMT -5
I tried to give your Bucks and the Sixers as much credit as I could. Great team chemistry for both teams, which is why you two have the best records in the East, but I may even have been a little generous by ranking JO and Hill at the top of the Honourable Mentions list at their position. No way Jermaine O'Neal > DRob... Like I said, I was being generous there... just wanted to give the Sixers some credit somehow. At the time they had the best record in the entire league. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Oct 21, 2009 11:21:31 GMT -5
Firstly, I'd like to say that this article took hours to write and is nearly 6000 words in length, so I honestly think it should be credited as two articles, or worthy of two lots of article points. I could've split this into two articles anyway, but wanted to keep it all together. Ashes, it's your call I guess. Just to let you know that almost every article that is been deemed 5 has been over 6,000 words so yours is nothing out of the ordinary. My last 3 articles have been around 7,200 words each time and also take a few hours to do. I'm sure brophdog spends a great deal of time on his too so in no way shape or form should this be counted as two articles. You did a great job and I enjoyed it a lot but fact remains it's one article. If you wanted to split it into two then you had your opportunity to post it as such. I think we've been pretty liberal tossing out points to those who do crappy articles like Marty's which was 620 words we voted a 4 for it. |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Oct 21, 2009 13:38:16 GMT -5
god damn, that is a long article.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Oct 21, 2009 14:09:37 GMT -5
this league writes some great articles. ^^^ |
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 21, 2009 15:37:23 GMT -5
Firstly, I'd like to say that this article took hours to write and is nearly 6000 words in length, so I honestly think it should be credited as two articles, or worthy of two lots of article points. I could've split this into two articles anyway, but wanted to keep it all together. Ashes, it's your call I guess. Just to let you know that almost every article that is been deemed 5 has been over 6,000 words so yours is nothing out of the ordinary. My last 3 articles have been around 7,200 words each time and also take a few hours to do. I'm sure brophdog spends a great deal of time on his too so in no way shape or form should this be counted as two articles. You did a great job and I enjoyed it a lot but fact remains it's one article. If you wanted to split it into two then you had your opportunity to post it as such. I think we've been pretty liberal tossing out points to those who do crappy articles like Marty's which was 620 words we voted a 4 for it. What are you talking about 7,200 words? Your last article was 1,700 words you fool. |
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 21, 2009 15:41:52 GMT -5
And your Western Conference Draft grade article was also around 1,700 words. Where in the fuck are you getting 7,200 from?
And yeah, I easily could've split it into more articles. I could've done one for each of the three teams I ranked and then another for honourable mentions, but what's the point. It's one article, so I wanted to keep it all together because it's a nice article all in one and the league deserves good reads. I've written enough to be worth 3 times your articles but I know the limit is two, so I'm not asking for 3 +5's or anything like that. Just thought that this article was worth more than just one +5.
If you disagree that's up to you but I think that's pretty fucked up.
|
|
|
|
Post by SUPERMOTHERFUCKINGSTAR on Oct 21, 2009 21:25:04 GMT -5
nick anderson not even an honorable mention?  sad to see him disappear from getting love. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Oct 21, 2009 21:44:46 GMT -5
And your Western Conference Draft grade article was also around 1,700 words. Where in the fuck are you getting 7,200 from? And yeah, I easily could've split it into more articles. I could've done one for each of the three teams I ranked and then another for honourable mentions, but what's the point. It's one article, so I wanted to keep it all together because it's a nice article all in one and the league deserves good reads. I've written enough to be worth 3 times your articles but I know the limit is two, so I'm not asking for 3 +5's or anything like that. Just thought that this article was worth more than just one +5. If you disagree that's up to you but I think that's pretty fucked up. Anyways It's 5,500 words not 7,200 also if you take out all the repeated headings you give of each player and their copy pasted stats then its also about 2,000 words less too. My point is it's one article so it deserves credit for one article. If you wanted to break it up into two then you should have but you didn't. Shit the table that broph did was a lot better than this in my opinion. I thought this article was great don't get me wrong but get off your pedestal asking for double points. |
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 22, 2009 1:49:25 GMT -5
And your Western Conference Draft grade article was also around 1,700 words. Where in the fuck are you getting 7,200 from? And yeah, I easily could've split it into more articles. I could've done one for each of the three teams I ranked and then another for honourable mentions, but what's the point. It's one article, so I wanted to keep it all together because it's a nice article all in one and the league deserves good reads. I've written enough to be worth 3 times your articles but I know the limit is two, so I'm not asking for 3 +5's or anything like that. Just thought that this article was worth more than just one +5. If you disagree that's up to you but I think that's pretty fucked up. Anyways It's 5,500 words not 7,200 also if you take out all the repeated headings you give of each player and their copy pasted stats then its also about 2,000 words less too. My point is it's one article so it deserves credit for one article. If you wanted to break it up into two then you should have but you didn't. Shit the table that broph did was a lot better than this in my opinion. I thought this article was great don't get me wrong but get off your pedestal asking for double points. What the fuck are you on? NONE of your articles are anywhere near 5,500 words! Are you stupid? If this is the type of reaction then fuck it I@m not writing any more articles. |
|
sad to see him disappear from getting love.