|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 8, 2010 17:31:17 GMT -5
Uh, shaun both of these deals better put you under the HC, since they have to wait until FA is done. If they don't, you'll have like 3 hours to do it...
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Feb 8, 2010 17:42:18 GMT -5
Uh, shaun both of these deals better put you under the HC, since they have to wait until FA is done. If they don't, you'll have like 3 hours to do it... That would be horrible. But very, very funny. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 8, 2010 17:54:39 GMT -5
This needs to get done without the nyk 1st or void since I made a mistake with tmacz
|
|
|
|
Post by zyme on Feb 8, 2010 17:59:48 GMT -5
oh boy, this if faling apart for Orl, this could be very bad...
|
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Feb 8, 2010 18:17:31 GMT -5
Can you just replace it with a 1st of your own? Which will likely be worse than the Knicks one?
Or ... just an owed 1st is fine.
No way this is being void ... thats insane at this point
|
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Feb 8, 2010 18:18:37 GMT -5
Uh, shaun both of these deals better put you under the HC, since they have to wait until FA is done. If they don't, you'll have like 3 hours to do it... i thought SAC was under the cap? if the expiring is just 2 mill or so less than Sheed i should be under. Assuming the Pistons trade goes thru, which i dont see why it wont? |
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Feb 8, 2010 18:20:27 GMT -5
Uh, shaun both of these deals better put you under the HC, since they have to wait until FA is done. If they don't, you'll have like 3 hours to do it... i thought SAC was under the cap? if the expiring is just 2 mill or so less than Sheed i should be under. Assuming the Pistons trade goes thru, which i dont see why it wont? He traded for Pau which took a chunk of his cap away. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 8, 2010 18:22:50 GMT -5
Uh, shaun both of these deals better put you under the HC, since they have to wait until FA is done. If they don't, you'll have like 3 hours to do it... i thought SAC was under the cap? if the expiring is just 2 mill or so less than Sheed i should be under. Assuming the Pistons trade goes thru, which i dont see why it wont? May I ask how he'd be under cap when he's signing match expirings? |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Feb 8, 2010 18:26:23 GMT -5
hey a knicks pick
|
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Feb 8, 2010 18:30:45 GMT -5
i thought SAC was under the cap? if the expiring is just 2 mill or so less than Sheed i should be under. Assuming the Pistons trade goes thru, which i dont see why it wont? May I ask how he'd be under cap when he's signing match expirings? if he's under the cap, they wont need to match? it can be a couple mill under, assuming he has ANY capspace, which he appears to have? |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 8, 2010 18:35:20 GMT -5
No, because the 76ers trade takes his cap space.
|
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Feb 8, 2010 18:41:02 GMT -5
No, because the 76ers trade takes his cap space. i dont understand. he had $12,124,045 in cap before the trade. Green for Gasol loses him approx 6.5M of that cap. What am i missing? |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Feb 8, 2010 18:43:10 GMT -5
No, because the 76ers trade takes his cap space. i dont understand. he had $12,124,045 in cap before the trade. Green for Gasol loses him approx 6.5M of that cap. What am i missing? $6,500,000 in cap space isn't enough to take on rasheed's contract, so he will have to sign expiring one year deal players to be able to make the deal...thing is, signing those players will remove all the cap space he currently has |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 8, 2010 18:44:00 GMT -5
No 1st
|
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Feb 8, 2010 18:45:17 GMT -5
i dont understand. he had $12,124,045 in cap before the trade. Green for Gasol loses him approx 6.5M of that cap. What am i missing? $6,500,000 in cap space isn't enough to take on rasheed's contract, so he will have to sign expiring one year deal players to be able to make the deal...thing is, signing those players will remove all the cap space he currently has ok i gotcha. but still ... 15% less than Sheed's 1st yr would be around 14M ... which would create 2.5M in cap space. the cassell dealing should also free up that amount of cap. its just logistics at this point ... which is all im trying to say |
|
