|
Post by Kruwaukee on Mar 3, 2010 17:14:32 GMT -5
He put up 29 and 31 in the clinching games of the finals this year. He average 18ppg as a non option for me and is a stat filler along the boards. He's a very good player who's very underrated. If he was an option guy he'd be putting up 25+ If he were truly capable of that production, you would have optioned him. He's a nice complimentary player. That contract is going to kill in a few years If my team was different than he would be an option but who is he going to be an option over? AI? Allen? McDyess?
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 3, 2010 20:46:47 GMT -5
Why not McDyess? He isn't capable of scoring 25 like Fields is Milwaukee colors are really ugly...
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 3, 2010 20:48:34 GMT -5
ITS PINK (or am I just colorblind cause that really looks like Pink and Green not Red.....)
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 3, 2010 20:51:27 GMT -5
Magenta maybe
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 3, 2010 20:52:13 GMT -5
That word reminds me of Pokemon.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 3, 2010 20:52:16 GMT -5
Yeah your right, that is more of a magenta
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Mar 3, 2010 21:28:46 GMT -5
Why not McDyess? He isn't capable of scoring 25 like Fields is Milwaukee colors are really ugly... Well I run an outside focus offense which hurts McDyess' scoring numbers however he is a terrific passer out of the post and I do like him to get a number of touches for that reason as well as his ability to get to the FT line. I wouldn't run 3 perimeter guys as options because thats living and dying by the outside shot a little too much for my liking. I always run 1 perimeter player (SG/SF), 1 post (PF/C), and my PG as option players. There are certainly some extensions to that line of thinking but for the most part that is my ideal way of running things. I must know what I'm doing somewhat I did just win the championship.
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Mar 3, 2010 21:29:40 GMT -5
Also look at AI's numbers after Grant Hill left he exploded. Just because a guy isn't the main focus on your team doesn't mean he can't for others. Ray Allen is a good example of that too.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 4, 2010 4:01:39 GMT -5
WTF MY EYES!!! The pink is blinding.
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 4, 2010 4:06:15 GMT -5
and Fields, smh... Where is the love for this man? How many finals appearences does he need before people notice? Because Fields was leading these teams to finals appearances He was putting up 20+ for me in 2 of those 3 seasons, and he was putting up 17ppg for the Bucks, so stfu.
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 4, 2010 6:46:03 GMT -5
Why not McDyess? He isn't capable of scoring 25 like Fields is Milwaukee colors are really ugly... Well I run an outside focus offense which hurts McDyess' scoring numbers however he is a terrific passer out of the post and I do like him to get a number of touches for that reason as well as his ability to get to the FT line. I wouldn't run 3 perimeter guys as options because thats living and dying by the outside shot a little too much for my liking. I always run 1 perimeter player (SG/SF), 1 post (PF/C), and my PG as option players. There are certainly some extensions to that line of thinking but for the most part that is my ideal way of running things. I must know what I'm doing somewhat I did just win the championship. Ok
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 4, 2010 6:46:37 GMT -5
Also look at AI's numbers after Grant Hill left he exploded. Just because a guy isn't the main focus on your team doesn't mean he can't for others. Ray Allen is a good example of that too. True. That doesn't change my opinion, but that is very true
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 4, 2010 6:47:03 GMT -5
WTF MY EYES!!! The pink is blinding.
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 4, 2010 6:47:28 GMT -5
Because Fields was leading these teams to finals appearances He was putting up 20+ for me in 2 of those 3 seasons, and he was putting up 17ppg for the Bucks, so stfu. Your mom goes to college
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 4, 2010 6:51:38 GMT -5
Duckster you've been coming at me sideways lately and I just don't like it all of the stfu's and faggots are really out of character for you. I know I always getting on you about something but it's your own fault. I'd like to think that I'm non-confrontational and usually let the little shit go but for some reason I can't let this one go bruh. Maybe if you wouldn't make idiotic statements all the time I would leave you alone and go about my business but you always post something that irks me in some way. You imply that Fields is the main reason for these finals appearances while citing a few years at 20 and 17 PPG as your proof. Ya that's a cool story but I don't think I have to explain how ridiculous that implication is. I like Fields. Fields is an underrated player. Fields certainly helped the Rockets and Bucks. Fields is good complementary player and that's where it stops. Maybe you were being too generous or didn't realize the idiocy of the question you just asked. Here are some facts for you - He was the third on your teams and 3rd on the Bucks at best. Please think before you post and we can avoid these skirmishes. Thanks DBW
|
|