|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 24, 2010 11:21:21 GMT -5
I think I'll go for the rib-eye again...
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 24, 2010 11:21:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Mar 24, 2010 11:21:45 GMT -5
woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo |
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Mar 24, 2010 11:22:07 GMT -5
;ost
|
|
|
|
Post by gsnts725 on Mar 24, 2010 11:22:09 GMT -5
cuz sirloin is mad good  |
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 24, 2010 11:22:10 GMT -5
USA winning>>> But movie yus. |
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 24, 2010 11:22:43 GMT -5
The 300g Rib-eye is £18.50 ($27.50) and the 300g Sirloin is £20 ($30).
So the Rib-eye is cheaper... and more flavoursome imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 24, 2010 11:22:54 GMT -5
Free
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 24, 2010 11:23:14 GMT -5
I don't even know why I'm considering the sirloin. I mean, it's not bad at all, I love sirloin too... but rib-eye is right at the top imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by gsnts725 on Mar 24, 2010 11:23:17 GMT -5
free
|
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Mar 24, 2010 11:23:34 GMT -5
post
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 24, 2010 11:23:55 GMT -5
cuz sirloin is mad good So is rib-eye though! Hmm... they do fillet and rump too. Rump is a no. Fillet is expensive... but not as tasty as the rib-eye or sirloin... yeah that's a no too. |
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Mar 24, 2010 11:24:02 GMT -5
post
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 24, 2010 11:24:07 GMT -5
Damn thats expensive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 24, 2010 11:24:14 GMT -5
USA winning>>> But movie yus. Winning what? |
|
