|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 10:58:04 GMT -5
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 31, 2010 10:58:04 GMT -5
People pay too much attention to scouted potential. more deadly is a drop to C cause B just means he is scouted at 80 or less, but the big deal is it kills players value (Luol, Hodge....)...not that big of a stretch....that C- outside is the real killer...I dunno what to think about it...I said kinda scary...cause the game didn't even play him in preseason, and he didn't improve his handles.....(then again Chauncey dropped to B scouted....so did Wagner, and a lot of other players.....)
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 10:59:52 GMT -5
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 31, 2010 10:59:52 GMT -5
C- outside isn't nice, but then, didn't Parker have similar ratings for quite a while before he developed into what he is now?
Also, yeah, C scouted potential it kills players' value, which is my point about how people pay too much attention to it. At the end of the day, it's not representative of actual potential. It should be, but it could be way off.
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:00:23 GMT -5
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 31, 2010 11:00:23 GMT -5
C- outside isn't nice, but then, didn't Parker have similar ratings for quite a while before he developed into what he is now? Also, yeah, C scouted potential it kills players' value, which is my point about how people pay too much attention to it. At the end of the day, it's not representative of actual potential. It should be, but it could be way off. Parker started at C outside, not D+
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:00:32 GMT -5
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 31, 2010 11:00:32 GMT -5
Like, the number of times you see players with C or D potential, yet improve in TC is quite a lot.
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:00:47 GMT -5
Post by mtg on Mar 31, 2010 11:00:47 GMT -5
law > paul
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:01:15 GMT -5
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 31, 2010 11:01:15 GMT -5
C- outside isn't nice, but then, didn't Parker have similar ratings for quite a while before he developed into what he is now? Also, yeah, C scouted potential it kills players' value, which is my point about how people pay too much attention to it. At the end of the day, it's not representative of actual potential. It should be, but it could be way off. I still would want him, yeah I pointed out the B scouted, but really its the C- outside that scares me on him and the lack of change to his handles
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:02:09 GMT -5
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 31, 2010 11:02:09 GMT -5
I don't know what to make of Hodge....
B- B- C+ A- B-
and of course he finally decides to go back to B scouted
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:03:12 GMT -5
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 31, 2010 11:03:12 GMT -5
Hodge is fucked up. It could be all speed and strength.
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:03:40 GMT -5
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 31, 2010 11:03:40 GMT -5
Also he's probably borderline C+/B- so won't put up outstanding numbers or anything.
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:05:51 GMT -5
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 31, 2010 11:05:51 GMT -5
Hodge is fucked up. It could be all speed and strength. he has it figured out somewhat, at least in preseason, mainly cause his FT % was actually good, his FG% wasnt great, and he can't block shots...ever (He has one in 97 career games) but he is a solid sub with good D
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:06:39 GMT -5
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 31, 2010 11:06:39 GMT -5
Also he's probably borderline C+/B- so won't put up outstanding numbers or anything. not expecting great numbers...just why the hell did he go up now.....and B- B- C+ A- B- is good off the bench...at SF...so he'll backup SG and SF for me....
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:07:53 GMT -5
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 31, 2010 11:07:53 GMT -5
He's weird. Anyway Broph, join BBS.
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:09:35 GMT -5
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 31, 2010 11:09:35 GMT -5
He's weird. Anyway Broph, join BBS. I wouldn't be active enough, I like focusing on just one league
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:13:38 GMT -5
Post by Tigertecz on Mar 31, 2010 11:13:38 GMT -5
Gosh darn it. You know I'm just going to keep asking you right? Sooner or later I'll be back to bug you.
|
|
|
TC!!
Mar 31, 2010 11:18:50 GMT -5
Post by shaunkol on Mar 31, 2010 11:18:50 GMT -5
Overall, not a great TC in Orlando. A lot of dropped potential offset by some improvements, here are some highlights
Javaris Crittenton PG 20 6'6'' 202 C+ B- C+ B- D+ A Javaris Crittenton PG 20 6'6'' 202 C+ B B- B D B
Crazy TC for Crit. Up in Outside, Handles, Defense ... down in Rebounding and Potential. Ill take it ... he's close to being an interesting PG.
Ryan Anderson PF 20 6'10'' 235 C+ B C C C+ B Ryan Anderson PF 20 6'10'' 235 C+ B C- C+ C+ A
Interesting, down in Handles, up in Defence and Potential. At 20 years old with that A potential, he could be a steal.
Michael Beasley SF 19 6'9'' 235 B- C+ C- C B- A Michael Beasley SF 19 6'9'' 235 B C+ C C+ B- B
I dont know quite what to make of Beasley. Up in Inside, Handles and Defense ... which is great; but dropping to B potential at 19 years old?? hmm, didnt see that one coming.
Andrew Bynum C 20 7'0'' 285 B C- D B- C+ A Andrew Bynum C 20 7'0'' 285 B C- D B- B- B
Again, my 20 year old center already down to B potential? Oh well ... up in rebounding. hopefully he has more in him.
Pretty mixed bag after that ... J.Smith down to B potential, JR Giddens with a nice little TC
|
|