|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 11, 2009 12:17:08 GMT -5
1-1 sim. I think the Grizzlies using - Jake Hiscock C 37 7'1'' 298 C- C- C- C+ C+ B as their #1 option with an outside focus isn't their best possible lineup. No one likes a snitch! Just ask CC. But seriously, I already know and have addressed it. |
|
|
|
Post by mops on Mar 11, 2009 12:25:01 GMT -5
1-2 and one game back from tops in the west. I am actually ok in dropping in the standings as I dont think we'd make it out of the first round anyway. So a better pick to go with a team who I think will be even better next year would be nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on Mar 11, 2009 12:28:58 GMT -5
Lets do a mid afternoon Sim and then an evening sim!
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 11, 2009 12:29:42 GMT -5
Lets do a mid afternoon Sim and then an evening sim! Not going to happen. |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 11, 2009 12:30:09 GMT -5
1-1 sim. I think the Grizzlies using - Jake Hiscock C 37 7'1'' 298 C- C- C- C+ C+ B as their #1 option with an outside focus isn't their best possible lineup. god damn you gotta be kidding me |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 11, 2009 12:30:18 GMT -5
2-1. beat the bullets nice
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 11, 2009 12:31:36 GMT -5
i hope the grizzlies get fucked out of the top pick. That dc is bullshit.
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on Mar 11, 2009 12:34:24 GMT -5
Lets do a mid afternoon Sim and then an evening sim! Not going to happen. Well I tried... |
|
|
|
Post by cllaatsch on Mar 11, 2009 12:51:51 GMT -5
The West is terrible. I am 10-9 and still in fourth.
|
|
|
|
Post by jusstaddwatrr on Mar 11, 2009 13:08:29 GMT -5
another 1-1 sim. fine by me with ewing and hotrod out.
|
|
|
|
Post by gp on Mar 11, 2009 13:34:20 GMT -5
1-1. Ugh.
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Mar 11, 2009 13:54:50 GMT -5
2-1.
Beat the Celtics. Dream with 42/18.
Lost to the Knicks. Shut down Reggie, but Cummings killed us.
Beat the Bucks. Dream with 31/16/6 blocks, Maxwell with 22.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Mar 11, 2009 14:12:55 GMT -5
Wow. Isn't their a rule for no deliberate tanking (I.E. no fucked up DC where your best player isn't #1? Not saying you can't try to lose, but you have to put your best possible DC out there at all times, or at least what you consider to be the best shot at getting you the win).
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Mar 11, 2009 14:21:50 GMT -5
Wow. Isn't their a rule for no deliberate tanking (I.E. no fucked up DC where your best player isn't #1? Not saying you can't try to lose, but you have to put your best possible DC out there at all times, or at least what you consider to be the best shot at getting you the win). It's already been taken care of |
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Mar 11, 2009 14:22:52 GMT -5
Been playing some pretty good ball lately. Up to #5 in the East.
|
|
