|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 8, 2010 17:30:59 GMT -5
Milsapp's ratings took a dive, which hurt his value, Redd is 30 and now doesn't have the C+ inside, doubt he fetches top 10 value...Ming expires next year, and will most likely demand a lot more money They still deserve to be on the list. Redd is a monster simmer who is locked up for a very reasonable price. You can't tell me doesn't command value at 30 especially if Stevenson is on the list. Also Yao's contract is just as long as Durants. yes, true, however, Yao's ratings aren't as nice, and he isn't as young, Stevenson on the list can be argued, though his ratings are amazing, and remember he said criteria were not just how the player sims.....this is a trade value piece, not best player piece Youth will always be higher when equal.... |
|
|
|
Post by Hannah Montana on May 8, 2010 17:32:27 GMT -5
Broph, you have my article idea!
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on May 8, 2010 17:34:11 GMT -5
Turner could probably get any player in the league. This is trade value...Redd, Millsap, Yao aren't going to get you anything great right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on May 8, 2010 17:35:52 GMT -5
There was about 20 players I got it down to and had to choose from. It was probably harder this time than it was last time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hannah Montana on May 8, 2010 17:37:14 GMT -5
Probably wouldnt do Turner for Durant. Maybe I'm being biased, but just my opinion
|
|
|
|
Post by Hannah Montana on May 8, 2010 17:37:43 GMT -5
Meh, who knows.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on May 8, 2010 17:38:10 GMT -5
Durant is a better scorer right now. Turner is already a better passer, defender and rebounder. And is only in his second year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on May 8, 2010 17:38:13 GMT -5
I wouldn't trade Durant for Turner...
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 8, 2010 17:43:08 GMT -5
They still deserve to be on the list. Redd is a monster simmer who is locked up for a very reasonable price. You can't tell me doesn't command value at 30 especially if Stevenson is on the list. Also Yao's contract is just as long as Durants. yes, true, however, Yao's ratings aren't as nice, and he isn't as young, Stevenson on the list can be argued, though his ratings are amazing, and remember he said criteria were not just how the player sims.....this is a trade value piece, not best player piece Youth will always be higher when equal.... I'd take Yao over Dwight in a trade. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 8, 2010 17:43:34 GMT -5
Turner could probably get any player in the league. This is trade value...Redd, Millsap, Yao aren't going to get you anything great right now. I don't think I would trade Amare to get Turner..Durant I would...Durant is already a 28 ppg scorer, yes, Turner can do everything, but he isn't Lebron James 2.0....he is Lamar Odom 2.0..Turner is a to whore as well, but Durant can rebound well score amazingly, and is improving that defense....he isn't a to whore, and is a solid passer |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 8, 2010 17:44:44 GMT -5
Terrance Williams > Evan Turner
ROY! FTW!
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 8, 2010 17:45:26 GMT -5
btw...this article is a 5. No one should vote otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 8, 2010 17:45:27 GMT -5
yes, true, however, Yao's ratings aren't as nice, and he isn't as young, Stevenson on the list can be argued, though his ratings are amazing, and remember he said criteria were not just how the player sims.....this is a trade value piece, not best player piece Youth will always be higher when equal.... I'd take Yao over Dwight in a trade. I would too...not doubting that, problem is, Dwight has name and nice ratings....and is four years younger, meaning odds are good if shopped....somebody will offer more for him than they would for Yao |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 8, 2010 17:47:00 GMT -5
I'd take Yao over Dwight in a trade. I would too...not doubting that, problem is, Dwight has name and nice ratings....and is four years younger, meaning odds are good if shopped....somebody will offer more for him than they would for Yao The person who values Dwight more than Yao is a sucker. Yao hands down is much more valuable and attractive in a trade problem is that Yao is a Clipper and crazymike keeps his guys for life. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 8, 2010 17:49:35 GMT -5
I would too...not doubting that, problem is, Dwight has name and nice ratings....and is four years younger, meaning odds are good if shopped....somebody will offer more for him than they would for Yao The person who values Dwight more than Yao is a sucker. Yao hands down is much more valuable and attractive in a trade problem is that Yao is a Clipper and crazymike keeps his guys for life. problem for Mike is he really can't trade Yao...wouldn't do him any good...Yao is his supplier of Blocks and rebounds....he tried to deal for Chandler last year remember, but failed....since he actually didn't get a confirm.....Granger is a complimentary player...thats the murder for them |
|
