|
Post by aar on May 11, 2010 11:06:28 GMT -5
no
|
|
|
Post by jediskywalker on May 11, 2010 11:07:17 GMT -5
Playoffs don't renew CY in this?
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 11, 2010 11:10:13 GMT -5
Playoffs don't renew CY in this? Yes they do. marty doesn't want them to.
|
|
|
Post by jediskywalker on May 11, 2010 11:13:37 GMT -5
Lol. No option for no either, lols.
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on May 11, 2010 11:14:40 GMT -5
no, this shit's stupid. You lower the win count by 2 and the cy by one year and playoffs is pointless if you have less than 42...gtfo.
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on May 11, 2010 11:20:05 GMT -5
Making the playoffs should still renew the contract. The whole point of this is not allowing people to sit in the lotto for 6-7 years right?
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 11, 2010 11:26:29 GMT -5
Making the playoffs should still renew the contract. The whole point of this is not allowing people to sit in the lotto for 6-7 years right? as long as we reduce it from 5 to 4 years I am perfectly fine with doing 42 or playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 11, 2010 11:29:08 GMT -5
If you go 3 years without winning 42 games, or making the playoffs you will enter your Contract Year. If you fail to make the playoffs or win 42 in the fourth season, you will be fired.
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 11, 2010 11:31:42 GMT -5
I mean I'm pretty sure everyone realizes why there haven't been many trades lately
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 11, 2010 11:33:52 GMT -5
I mean I'm pretty sure everyone realizes why there haven't been many trades lately Because the teams who approach their CY quit or get fired and it resets itself?
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on May 11, 2010 11:33:59 GMT -5
If you go 3 years without winning 42 games, or making the playoffs you will enter your Contract Year. If you fail to make the playoffs or win 42 in the fourth season, you will be fired. Ok so we are just taking a year off. I'm fine with that
|
|
|
Post by iflip on May 11, 2010 11:35:10 GMT -5
can we have this conversation after 2 seasons has passed by. lol.
i mean i'm down if the majority of the league is down. but changing the rule does suck for the people getting close to their contract years. i dunno it might not seem fair. if this does go down might wanna give everyone a clean slate of something. just my 2 cents.
also how many problem gms are there actually?
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 11, 2010 11:36:12 GMT -5
i mean i'm down if the majority of the league is down. but changing the rule does suck for the people getting close to their contract years. i dunno it might not seem fair. if this does go down might wanna give everyone a clean slate of something. just my 2 cents. I brought up that point previously in this thread...no one responded. The problem with the clean slate is it gives those teams who have tanked for years a chance to tank again and get more high picks.
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on May 11, 2010 11:37:10 GMT -5
The problem with any change is how do you do it? Do you just all of a sudden take away a year for a team who had a game plan and now you are saying "screw that" to them? Do you reset everyone's CY, basically giving the tanking teams a free pass? The problem is implementing any change. I am not against a change, but the only thing I would change is reduction of the years from what we currently have. This is a problem. I don't want any guys who are already close to the CY getting a clean slate but then how else can we implement this
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 11, 2010 11:40:20 GMT -5
The problem with taking a year off is that it screws those who were planning their team and future based on the current structure.
One solution might be that as teams reach their CY and have it reset, that they switch over to the 4 year plan (starting next season). So basically, if you fail to make the playoffs this season you will be on the 4-5 plan. However, if you do make it then you will be on the 3-4 plan when you go off of it. Whenever your CY will reset, you will be placed on the 3-4 plan.
|
|