|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 9, 2009 21:42:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Mar 9, 2009 21:44:16 GMT -5
16 Hawks 100, CAVALIERS 87
17 Heat 114, HAWKS 99
18 Hawks 85, GRIZZLIES 67
20 HAWKS 102, Mavericks 82
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 9, 2009 21:44:44 GMT -5
16 Hawks 100, CAVALIERS 87 17 Heat 114, HAWKS 99 18 Hawks 85, GRIZZLIES 67 20 HAWKS 102, Mavericks 82 Gotta tank better then that! |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 9, 2009 21:48:34 GMT -5
At least the Grizzlies knew how to tank.
|
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on Mar 9, 2009 22:20:38 GMT -5
I'm kickin ass
|
|
|
|
Post by idle on Mar 9, 2009 22:51:01 GMT -5
Great job Spence - best GMmanship I've seen.
chipper how did you not get the Kings or Pacers 1997 1sts out of this deal? all you got by dealing malone was mashburn and a very low 1st in '96 - and fixing your mistake of dealing your 93 and 95 1sts.
just a very poor performance so far in this league.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Mar 10, 2009 0:25:10 GMT -5
Now ashes has to go ruin everything by telling me he's a bust in a triple post. :\
|
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Mar 10, 2009 0:50:40 GMT -5
lol, ill take him  |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 10, 2009 1:00:39 GMT -5
I love how this thread is 5 pages but it's mostly between ashes, spence, and chip trying to make this deal work lol.
Sick trade for Hornets. But it makes sense for Hawks.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 10, 2009 12:38:20 GMT -5
mashburn is a bust how sad
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Mar 10, 2009 13:09:57 GMT -5
mashburn is a bust how sad Nah, I doubt it, tbh. |
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Mar 11, 2009 2:30:54 GMT -5
i've spent like ten minutes trying to give my opinion on this and i'm not sure what to say
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Mar 11, 2009 2:32:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Mar 11, 2009 14:11:09 GMT -5
I think that pretty much sums it up. |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Mar 11, 2009 19:12:53 GMT -5
We should keep it going all year lol
|
|
