|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 0:31:58 GMT -5
glad at this point I didn't get #2...Bradley still looks sick, but, I would not like that TC
|
|
|
|
Post by jediskywalker on May 23, 2010 0:34:22 GMT -5
Where'd he -1? His scouted pot went down... so what. I'd give him B+. I wouldn't have taken anyone else at #2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 0:39:23 GMT -5
Where'd he -1? His scouted pot went down... so what. I'd give him B+. I wouldn't have taken anyone else at #2. thing is, just because he was the obvious pick doesn't mean it was a good one, the Blazers get hammered for Oden, when he was the near consensus #1.... |
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on May 23, 2010 0:43:30 GMT -5
I'm shocked a lot of people thought that high of Bradley...No way he should have went at 2...There were 2 obvious selections at pick 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 23, 2010 0:45:19 GMT -5
Nice job, but I don't think Avery Bradley should get an A.. He went up 1 category, and went down 1 category. ie, he didn't improve. IMO B or B-, especially when you look at how much Selby, Knight, and Thompkins improved. true, didn't really pay attention to that. i'll change it. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 1:01:28 GMT -5
I'm shocked a lot of people thought that high of Bradley...No way he should have went at 2...There were 2 obvious selections at pick 2. League Leader in Steals, and B+ Inside B+ defense will lead to overvaluing |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 1:02:03 GMT -5
I didn't see an obvious selection at 2...but if Selby was one of em, I'll take it
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on May 23, 2010 1:23:48 GMT -5
definitely fucked up by not picking knight.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 23, 2010 1:57:04 GMT -5
4 more..
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on May 23, 2010 2:01:27 GMT -5
Love all my top 4 picks perry, smith, harris, and richards. Last two suck but can't get them all right. Pretty fucking good draft for the knicks.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 23, 2010 2:07:32 GMT -5
yeah overall i think you had the best draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on May 23, 2010 2:08:07 GMT -5
I'm shocked a lot of people thought that high of Bradley...No way he should have went at 2...There were 2 obvious selections at pick 2. meh I wouldn't say no way @ #2, but Selby and Knight were higher on my board. I just hate how one dimensional Bradley... Plays D and can score inside... Not being able to shoot or handle the ball as a SG is a big turn off for me. |
|
|
|
Post by jediskywalker on May 23, 2010 10:01:04 GMT -5
Uhm. Who's the obvious #2? BK was going to be a huge reach at that point and Selby... don't get me started. Your notes said he would be turnover crazy, that makes people SHY AWAY from a player, especially at the #2 slot.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 23, 2010 10:36:35 GMT -5
4 more.... I pmd all 29 gms..
|
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on May 23, 2010 10:48:42 GMT -5
Uhm. Who's the obvious #2? BK was going to be a huge reach at that point and Selby... don't get me started. Your notes said he would be turnover crazy, that makes people SHY AWAY from a player, especially at the #2 slot. Yah my notes said turnover crazy, but thats why we have Articles and IT's to improve players in certain areas...BK has pretty good notes and usually when a young PG has starting ratings such as BK you take him. Maybe its just me but no way I would have selected Bradley at 2. But I'm glad my drafts can be unpredictable. |
|
