|
|
Post by House on May 23, 2010 17:47:49 GMT -5
lol JO is 32 with a two year deal...why would he do that deal when Dwight is younger on a longer contract, and arguably is better.....so he loses Sullinger, versus losing two picks...when he already has dumped his next two This. All about age and talent. |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on May 23, 2010 17:48:59 GMT -5
just ignore the fact he included bradley. |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on May 23, 2010 17:49:35 GMT -5
This notion that all he gave was sullinger and Bradley isn't productive so he's not much is pretty dumb. Sullinger and Bradley might not produce yet, but both could have gotten something more than Dwight. Solid for both, but chip far from won the deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 17:52:10 GMT -5
just ignore the fact he included bradley. ???what am I ignoring? the Philly deal was Bradley+2 picks for JO+1 the Lakers Deal is Bradley+Sullinger for Dwight so the difference between this deal and the Philly deal is Sullinger, versus losing two firsts and how is trading for a younger better player, rather than a 32 year old on a two year deal setting yourself up to tank |
|
|
|
Post by House on May 23, 2010 17:54:30 GMT -5
This notion that all he gave was sullinger and Bradley isn't productive so he's not much is pretty dumb. Sullinger and Bradley might not produce yet, but both could have gotten something more than Dwight. Solid for both, but chip far from won the deal. I needed a big. There are like 3 in the league that Sullinger and Bradley together are worth. You wouldn't do it with Emeka, shaun won't deal Smith, so i went with, IMO, a top 3 big in this league. Defensively at least. |
|
|
|
Post by House on May 23, 2010 17:55:43 GMT -5
???what am I ignoring? the Philly deal was Bradley+2 picks for JO+1 the Lakers Deal is Bradley+Sullinger for Dwight so the difference between this deal and the Philly deal is Sullinger, versus losing two firsts and how is trading for a younger better player, rather than a 32 year old on a two year deal setting yourself up to tank this, I'm confused. |
|
|
|
Post by House on May 23, 2010 18:07:36 GMT -5
To answer Kobe's earlier ? btw, my bro is going to Notre Dame.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 18:09:04 GMT -5
That's all? Lol. You've proven to be a terrible GM time and time again, constantly going AWOL after you've taken control of a team. Your gimmick is funny and the fact that all you can do is laugh about it makes you the joke, not me. Sullinger for Brand is bad? 20/10/2 on solid % means nothing I guess. I still don't understand why you guys slobber all over Dwight's cock. Brand as stated by Chipper is 32 expiring, and Sullinger is a Number 2 pick who has had two real nice Training camps...you are as bad as mops |
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on May 23, 2010 18:10:49 GMT -5
Actually I think I told him I was willing to only get his 14.
So potentially:
Jo
my first this year(possible lotto without Jo)
for
Bradley
14 first
Much better then giving both sully and Bradley for a less talented Dwight at this point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 18:11:58 GMT -5
Actually I think I told him I was willing to only get his 14. So potentially: Jo my first this year(possible lotto without Jo) for Bradley 14 first Much better then giving both sully and Bradley for a less talented Dwight at this point. your pick wouldn't be lotto, the entire east is meh outside the Pacers.....I think Chip shoulda done Reke for Okafor....I still do actually but meh, its his call |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 18:12:38 GMT -5
Actually I think I told him I was willing to only get his 14. So potentially: Jo my first this year(possible lotto without Jo) for Bradley 14 first Much better then giving both sully and Bradley for a less talented Dwight at this point. Dwighnt is at least=to Jermaine, more blocks similar rebounder, and both are offensive underachievers....Dwight is just well younger |
|
|
|
Post by House on May 23, 2010 18:37:48 GMT -5
Yeah, what he said. And Tmacz, you never told me you'd do it without a 2nd piece, I have the PMs. Even still, I woulda gone Dwight based on what Broph just said.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on May 23, 2010 18:44:56 GMT -5
Damn, this thread is like at 6 pages now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 23, 2010 18:45:22 GMT -5
only five chip
|
|
|
|
Post by House on May 23, 2010 18:46:32 GMT -5
Can this be a post pad thread? That would be awesome.
|
|
