|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on May 26, 2010 1:11:52 GMT -5
yea, that's good ducky.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 26, 2010 1:15:55 GMT -5
meh, how about we land right in between 2-5 meh IT is supposed to be an added bonus to GMs who do the norm around here... Writing articles and doing jobs around the league is where I want most the +'s to come from. Or if you really want.. 0-5 100 1-5 200 2-5 300 I'd be down with that. Not sure how many gms had 300, but I'd say about 10 gms.. I like it..............but as the biggest spammer on the boards.....I don't like the 100 post regular season thing....only 1 or 2 gms a year reach that right now, and it would lead to more stupid posting
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 26, 2010 2:16:32 GMT -5
Ducky more people would get to your number than they would mine. At least I'm aiming to have productive posts to promote league wide activity involving the sim. It's also very difficult to achieve.
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on May 26, 2010 2:23:08 GMT -5
Ducky more people would get to your number than they would mine. At least I'm aiming to have productive posts to promote league wide activity involving the sim. It's also very difficult to achieve. IMO we get enough activity in the regular season discussion thread though.. I'd rather have some more off topic posting or some more trading. Activity here is already pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 26, 2010 2:32:58 GMT -5
18 GMs had less than 20 posts last season. Thats good?
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 26, 2010 2:38:02 GMT -5
Only 4 GMs had more than 50 posts. So if this rule passes what are you worried about?
How many had above 200-300+ posts overall though. I'm sure a lot more.
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on May 26, 2010 2:40:38 GMT -5
18 GMs had less than 20 posts last season. Thats good? That's not great, but not horrible either. If half the GMs post just once each sim in the thread, I'm OK with that.
|
|
|
Post by J on May 26, 2010 2:40:38 GMT -5
I voted No to both because I didn't feel like reading the thread.
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on May 26, 2010 2:41:46 GMT -5
I voted No to both because I didn't feel like reading the thread. this kid's a joke.
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on May 26, 2010 2:42:20 GMT -5
I voted No to both because I didn't feel like reading the thread.
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 26, 2010 5:52:58 GMT -5
Yes to the article, no to the IT.
IT is a gift. I agree that it should be 0-5 or 1-5 instead of a -1 being an option (if it still is).
If you want an upgrade, write an article. The IT is like the lottery, you are gambling. If you don't feel like gambling, then don't post an IT.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on May 26, 2010 6:15:43 GMT -5
Post counts in regular season thread are whack. I mean, someone can use one post saying simply "4-1" or something and that counts for the same amount as say when I do a sim summary in one post outlining every game in my sim with highlight statlines?
It's fucked up.
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 26, 2010 9:26:59 GMT -5
Post counts in regular season thread are whack. I mean, someone can use one post saying simply "4-1" or something and that counts for the same amount as say when I do a sim summary in one post outlining every game in my sim with highlight statlines? It's fucked up. Well this is kind of what I'm trying to help out. There are some GMs who do more in the league and I think they deserve the credit. I also think this might boost activity from the weaker GMs as well. I'm open to other ideas but I think this might help stir things in the right direction.
|
|
|
Post by jediskywalker on May 26, 2010 10:06:28 GMT -5
Taking credit of my IT idea and then ruining it...
|
|
|
Post by jediskywalker on May 26, 2010 10:07:42 GMT -5
I agree with Ducky... since that was the initial idea until broph decided to be a fucktard but that's all good.
|
|