|
|
Post by J on Jun 30, 2010 15:30:39 GMT -5
Gave it a 4 because I feel like the grades were more on the player picked rather than who was available when the team selected the player and if they got great value or not.
You'll get a +5 anyway, but I feel like that's a legit beef.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Jun 30, 2010 15:32:42 GMT -5
I gave it a 5, a league article that covers an entire 5 is an automatic 5 unless it's written horribly.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Jun 30, 2010 15:33:58 GMT -5
use a different color too do it, the color you used is completely unseeable in the Texas skin Texas skin is gay, that's why. |
|
|
|
Post by J on Jun 30, 2010 15:35:17 GMT -5
I gave it a 5, a league article that covers an entire 5 is an automatic 5 unless it's written horribly. I think it's crap that team articles are never given 5's because it encourages the same article to be written every year with the same grades no matter how good the content is. |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Jun 30, 2010 15:37:11 GMT -5
I gave it a 5, a league article that covers an entire 5 is an automatic 5 unless it's written horribly. I think it's crap that team articles are never given 5's because it encourages the same article to be written every year with the same grades no matter how good the content is. When team articles are boring tbh, I have very little interest to read you make up quotes about your team. A league article is much more interesting. With that being said, I'd still give you a 5 on a team article if I believe you honestly deserve it. But generally team articles are shorter and less quality anyway |
|
|
|
Post by J on Jun 30, 2010 15:42:36 GMT -5
I think it's crap that team articles are never given 5's because it encourages the same article to be written every year with the same grades no matter how good the content is. When team articles are boring tbh, I have very little interest to read you make up quotes about your team. A league article is much more interesting. With that being said, I'd still give you a 5 on a team article if I believe you honestly deserve it. But generally team articles are shorter and less quality anyway There are things about a team that you can actually analyze deeply that doesn't involve fake interviews and the such. Actually it involves more than general comments which is what 90% of league articles do. But GMs rate them higher cause they feel involved. Time for me to do two BS power rankings articles for +5's. |
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Jun 30, 2010 15:53:16 GMT -5
Very good read, Mason is playing real well with limited minutes.. Dexter better watch out
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Jun 30, 2010 16:11:30 GMT -5
Gave it a 4 because I feel like the grades were more on the player picked rather than who was available when the team selected the player and if they got great value or not. You'll get a +5 anyway, but I feel like that's a legit beef. lol |
|
|
|
Post by House on Jun 30, 2010 17:07:40 GMT -5
Yeah, now I know why, I use the normal white and blue skin so it never was seen.
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Jun 30, 2010 17:10:42 GMT -5
DJ is awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Jun 30, 2010 19:01:50 GMT -5
I use the Oregon skin.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Jun 30, 2010 19:04:57 GMT -5
lol, so the Mavs received the only A?
The Richardson pick is an A and the Cook pick as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Jun 30, 2010 19:11:52 GMT -5
Agreed. League articles > team articles. J, you write an article about your squad, to be frank, I'm not going to read it. If it's comparing your team to others, even if not mine, then sure, I will.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Jun 30, 2010 20:12:55 GMT -5
5
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Jun 30, 2010 23:45:31 GMT -5
lol, so the Mavs received the only A? The Richardson pick is an A and the Cook pick as well. A lot of the grade was based on the TC. Jonas had the only +5. |
|
