|
Post by martinez on Jul 1, 2010 13:12:54 GMT -5
Not that the Kings should have been as good as they are now last year but they should have been a lot closer. Amazing what happens when Marty puts in a DC from day 1. Other than the Pacers not being #1 I think this is really well done. you are fucking retarded Outlaw was out for most of the year and Rubio, Whiteside, and Varejao all went up in TC. Get your facts straight dumbass.
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Jul 1, 2010 13:21:10 GMT -5
Not that the Kings should have been as good as they are now last year but they should have been a lot closer. Amazing what happens when Marty puts in a DC from day 1. Other than the Pacers not being #1 I think this is really well done. you are fucking retarded Outlaw was out for most of the year and Rubio, Whiteside, and Varejao all went up in TC. Get your facts straight dumbass. No need to start calling me names. Your team has underachieved the last few seasons. I know you had some injuries but you've had this core of talent for quite some time now. Rubio improving has helped a ton but Outlaw, Wagner, Bosh, and Varejao have been in their primes
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 1, 2010 13:27:51 GMT -5
nope
|
|
|
Post by J on Jul 1, 2010 13:44:10 GMT -5
11. Atlanta Hawks (15-12)The Hawks are on top of the 2nd tier teams in the power rankings due to strong play from the one-two punch of DSS and KA. These two guys are pretty much carrying the load, though every other position in the SL could use an upgrade. I’d say Hump, Powell, and Greene are decent players but role players at best. J has been tweaking his “Championship Depth Chart” to figure out the best lineup right now, though he is still actively looking for help as DSS and Knight have been put on the trading block. Strong play of KA? He doesn't have a strong achilles.
|
|
|
Post by iflip on Jul 1, 2010 13:49:09 GMT -5
nice ray. you on a roll with these rankings. keep it up, you're not gonna get fired anymore. lol.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jul 1, 2010 13:49:58 GMT -5
lol at J, but this is a sick article, I really wish I had set up my team a bit differently, Millsap Jameer Henry and Chauncey/Klay are all at their best in an outside offense, meanwhile Favors is at his best in a balanced/inside, so I have a bit of a problem....but Derrick Favors not fitting is a decent problem to have...
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on Jul 1, 2010 13:51:47 GMT -5
ah shit, true i didnt even factor injuries this time around, o well i guess i deserve 4s
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Jul 1, 2010 14:43:13 GMT -5
Other than the Pacers not being #1 I think this is really well done. Funny. When I wrote this exact article last season you gave me a 4 for following the standings and lack of analysis. Ib4 followed the standings and my article had equal or more analysis. Good read here hopefully we continue to prove. Arenas only got to play 2 games the past sim so I'm more excited about the next one.
|
|
|
Post by J on Jul 1, 2010 14:48:13 GMT -5
ah shit, true i didnt even factor injuries this time around, o well i guess i deserve 4s I gave you a 5.
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on Jul 1, 2010 14:48:28 GMT -5
thanks for all the comments guys
and yeah, i stated it at the very top that i basically did this off standings lol
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Jul 1, 2010 16:28:10 GMT -5
Good Job, power rankings are always good.. I cant seem to find which one of Inside, Outside or Balanced is the right focus..
|
|
|
Post by James on Jul 1, 2010 18:16:53 GMT -5
Great article, 5.
Also, wouldn't mind peoples opinions on something. I traded for LeBron and I have the chance to put two superstars next to him...BUT, we have LeBron and we are still losing. So I'm almost tempted now to keep the team as it is, get a top 5 draft pick and start making moves NEXT season. I thought that with LeBron we'd start winning, then I'd trade Turner/Walker/Marhall/picks for better players (which I do have lined up) but it seems wiser to keep my youth in tact with LeBron, add a top 5 pick and make moves in my CY next year.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by spiritofexodus on Jul 1, 2010 19:15:29 GMT -5
Yeah so who wants Jordan eh?
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Jul 1, 2010 20:16:38 GMT -5
Other than the Pacers not being #1 I think this is really well done. Funny. When I wrote this exact article last season you gave me a 4 for following the standings and lack of analysis. Ib4 followed the standings and my article had equal or more analysis. Good read here hopefully we continue to prove. Arenas only got to play 2 games the past sim so I'm more excited about the next one. He didn't follow the standings exactly there are a few teams +/-
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Jul 1, 2010 23:31:12 GMT -5
Kings suck.
Nice work ray.
|
|