|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Jul 22, 2010 1:33:16 GMT -5
1 more
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Jul 22, 2010 4:07:05 GMT -5
Forgot to mention, nice job. 5th is a good spot for me I'd say. I beat the Kings this past sim, but they don't have Wagner, so we'll see. I like my chances though.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Jul 22, 2010 4:07:36 GMT -5
Also, I gave it a 5 earlier, but it's insane that this got 8 votes for 4 and only 7 for 5. That's pretty sad.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Jul 22, 2010 11:54:48 GMT -5
That's a joke. I wanna know each GM who voted 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Jul 22, 2010 12:35:22 GMT -5
+4 to Sullinger inside scoring unless some people wanna give a 5.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 22, 2010 12:44:53 GMT -5
i voted a 4 cuz it really isn't a 5
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 22, 2010 12:45:00 GMT -5
prolly should have been a 3 imho
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 22, 2010 12:45:28 GMT -5
Forgot to mention, nice job. 5th is a good spot for me I'd say. I beat the Kings this past sim, but they don't have Wagner, so we'll see. I like my chances though. and I've beaten you without him too |
|
|
|
Post by House on Jul 22, 2010 12:48:53 GMT -5
Yet I've been you twice with him. 3-1 vs you this season.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Jul 22, 2010 12:51:10 GMT -5
i voted a 4 cuz it really isn't a 5 Like I said, there's no way this should get a 4 and yours should get a 5. You wrote about 2 sentences about the top 16 teams and that's it. There was no quality in the article anyway. My article was 2-3 times longer and I broke the team down at their strengths and weaknesses. No way this doesn't deserve a 5. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 22, 2010 12:56:34 GMT -5
except you're wrong I did get a +4.. I just got the +5 because I had 8 +5 votes before I had 8 +4 votes.
So I win again
and you
> lose
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Jul 22, 2010 13:01:08 GMT -5
except you're wrong I did get a +4.. I just got the +5 because I had 8 +5 votes before I had 8 +4 votes. So I win again and you > lose lol you still got a +5 and that's all that matters. Who cares what the final vote ends up at. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 22, 2010 13:07:25 GMT -5
that's because me > you
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Jul 22, 2010 13:08:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 22, 2010 13:10:28 GMT -5
exactly so you could either
a) take the +4 and stfu
b) never write an article again
c)keep crying about how unfair this is about how you never get a fair trade because everyone overvalues their players yet you wanted 3 1sts for a bench player, quit after you had no mathematical basics and went over the hard cap because you overvalued your players so you quit and cried and only were let back in because ducky is your brother
|
|
