|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Aug 5, 2010 5:24:13 GMT -5
I think hard cap is fine where it is
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Aug 5, 2010 9:40:50 GMT -5
So you go over the hard cap, and you want it raised? Makes sense to me NOT Of course people will see it that way but the thing is I haven't... Yet. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Aug 5, 2010 10:46:09 GMT -5
I understand, and thats my point, I said I think, it should stay the same. I coulda had another title run, but HC means, no more, and since I dont see my team being a title contender, and with twoo Old Ass players, Its best I end my run and blow it up. I took my shot, it worked, and time to rebuild Yeah I know. It's just, people need to understand that they shouldn't believe they can give huge contracts out just because the player is half decent. HC is part of the game and we've had it at 80 forever, so why change it now? It's challenging, sure, but that's what's great. Why not change it now? |
|
|
|
Post by J on Aug 5, 2010 10:54:25 GMT -5
Cause
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Aug 5, 2010 11:02:57 GMT -5
and we need to get rid of the 100 posts = 1 RC thing because of spam like the above
|
|
|
|
Post by J on Aug 5, 2010 11:04:37 GMT -5
and we need to get rid of the 100 posts = 1 RC thing because of spam like the above Basically. But that post essentially says what most of the posts in this thread say. Why not change it, simply "because". Yannick Bokolo Shrug. |
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Aug 5, 2010 11:12:53 GMT -5
and we need to get rid of the 100 posts = 1 RC thing because of spam like the above lmao, you're the main culprit |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Aug 5, 2010 12:06:37 GMT -5
and we need to get rid of the 100 posts = 1 RC thing because of spam like the above lmao, you're the main culprit I never spam |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Aug 5, 2010 14:27:07 GMT -5
I'm re-evaluating that, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Aug 5, 2010 14:33:36 GMT -5
I didn't get an IT last year with this new system. I post a ton even with spam. I think the new system is great.
|
|
|
|
Post by Before I'm Gone on Aug 5, 2010 14:49:18 GMT -5
Why raise it when I'm 60m under? Oh well
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Aug 5, 2010 18:59:36 GMT -5
I didn't get an IT last year with this new system. I post a ton even with spam. I think the new system is great. I am the same. I have just saved up enough to get a +5, and I don't really spam all that much. |
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on Aug 25, 2010 15:53:39 GMT -5
I'll re-visit upping it to 82 next season. just curious, did this happen or nah |
|
|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Aug 25, 2010 15:54:46 GMT -5
I made my FA bids according to this answer being no.....
|
|
