|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Sept 14, 2010 21:33:42 GMT -5
Play your logic is awful, I'm not starting a budding SF over an aging veteran. It doesn't even happen that way in the NBA. lol so why would I take an aging veteran in Livingston and not start Brown? thanks for proving my point owned |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Sept 14, 2010 21:33:55 GMT -5
There's nothing wrong with a bench player being an option...if that bench player is getting minutes. At this rate AK will get like 14 minutes max barring any injuries. Each 2nd string slot is good for about 10-12 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Sept 14, 2010 21:33:58 GMT -5
i see why you were .500 now Stevenson missed the majority of the end of the season, yet my team was still able to beat you TWICE. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Sept 14, 2010 21:34:30 GMT -5
Livingston should still be 2nd string at the very least.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Sept 14, 2010 21:34:33 GMT -5
putting a bench player whose getting minutes as an option is good. He's putting his 3rd option on a dude getting 14 mpg
|
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Sept 14, 2010 21:35:13 GMT -5
Play your logic is awful, I'm not starting a budding SF over an aging veteran. It doesn't even happen that way in the NBA. lol so why would I take an aging veteran in Livingston and not start Brown? thanks for proving my point owned So you cut him and you're going to play players who you don't even have three bird years for? |
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Sept 14, 2010 21:35:31 GMT -5
Livingston should still be 2nd string at the very least. no livingston is no string...seriously gtfo of my trade thread.. |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Sept 14, 2010 21:35:50 GMT -5
haha
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Sept 14, 2010 21:36:04 GMT -5
I'll just say, it's debatable that Richmond is better than AK. AK might still be able to score as much, can rebound close to Richmond, and is an A defender. It's not like Richmond is anywhere close to head above AK.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Sept 14, 2010 21:36:06 GMT -5
lol so why would I take an aging veteran in Livingston and not start Brown? thanks for proving my point owned So you cut him and you're going to play players who you don't even have three bird years for? huh? did you look at my DC Brown has birds and Johnson has birds....once again GTFO |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Sept 14, 2010 21:37:45 GMT -5
Livingston should still be 2nd string at the very least. no livingston is no string...seriously gtfo of my trade thread.. Is that why you still have Miguel as your 2nd string? Livingston is your 2nd best PG, and very close to your 1st best. He's going to be your 2nd string. |
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Sept 14, 2010 21:38:04 GMT -5
So you cut him and you're going to play players who you don't even have three bird years for? huh? did you look at my DC Brown has birds and Johnson has birds....once again GTFO I'm willing to admit it was stupid of me to try to cut AK but its not like I'm playing it incorrectly by having him play behind Richmond. At least admit you're trying to do the same with livingston. |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Sept 14, 2010 21:40:17 GMT -5
huh? did you look at my DC Brown has birds and Johnson has birds....once again GTFO I'm willing to admit i'm stupid case closed |
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Sept 14, 2010 21:40:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Sept 14, 2010 21:41:13 GMT -5
no livingston is no string...seriously gtfo of my trade thread.. Is that why you still have Miguel as your 2nd string? Livingston is your 2nd best PG, and very close to your 1st best. He's going to be your 2nd string. No Johnson is going to be my 2nd string PG.... |
|
