|
Post by Brophdog88 on Sept 14, 2010 22:12:24 GMT -5
lol so had you resigned him, 8 years later, you know, after he enters FA a SECOND time...you woulda never had him...you said he was easily the best PG when you lost him, not even fucking close dude You're unwilling to admit that I would not have entered CY had I still had Tony Parker, that's the biggest flaw in your argument. But you'd prefer to cherry-pick stats from other years. We have no proof of that....you can claim it all you want, but maybe, just maybe, if you dont lose TP, other things change...Hell, had Saga drafted right, and taken TP instead of Boozer, as was a pretty obvious pick, you get CY'd quicker
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Sept 14, 2010 22:12:48 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Sept 14, 2010 22:12:50 GMT -5
lol, so, you expect his points and minutes to go up, but the turnovers conveniently won't? He played PF in preseason, that should explain everything. his turnovers will go up at SF, just so you know
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Sept 14, 2010 22:13:15 GMT -5
Oh wow he lost him in 2005? Where have I been? isnt that around when you came back...cant remember right now, not willing to look it up 2002 I came back
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Sept 14, 2010 22:13:45 GMT -5
isnt that around when you came back...cant remember right now, not willing to look it up 2002 I came back well how the hell did you not remember him losing him...lol Marty picked up Dirk from the Clippers too
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Sept 14, 2010 22:14:18 GMT -5
You're unwilling to admit that I would not have entered CY had I still had Tony Parker, that's the biggest flaw in your argument. But you'd prefer to cherry-pick stats from other years. We have no proof of that....you can claim it all you want, but maybe, just maybe, if you dont lose TP, other things change...Hell, had Saga drafted right, and taken TP instead of Boozer, as was a pretty obvious pick, you get CY'd quicker Proof of what? I even PMmed Saga asking him who he was taking and he said Boozer for sure because he had another PG at the time. So yes, I got lucky. But had I not taken Parker, I could have had someone else in the next draft but you can't cherry pick stats and assume things would have turned out the same had I never lost him.
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Sept 14, 2010 22:15:24 GMT -5
He played PF in preseason, that should explain everything. his turnovers will go up at SF, just so you know So his turnover where 1.5 for an entire season and was 1.6 at PF and you come across the conclusion that his TO will be higher at SF over PF over a small amount of games?
|
|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Sept 14, 2010 22:15:45 GMT -5
damn 9 pages jeez.
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Sept 14, 2010 22:16:15 GMT -5
you missed out traves
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Sept 14, 2010 22:16:20 GMT -5
We have no proof of that....you can claim it all you want, but maybe, just maybe, if you dont lose TP, other things change...Hell, had Saga drafted right, and taken TP instead of Boozer, as was a pretty obvious pick, you get CY'd quicker Proof of what? I even PMmed Saga asking him who he was taking and he said Boozer for sure because he had another PG at the time. So yes, I got lucky. But had I not taken Parker, I could have had someone else in the next draft but you can't cherry pick stats and assume things would have turned out the same had I never lost him. and you cant just assume things would have been great for you had you not lost him...I am doing no assuming of any kind...you have sucked here, its obvious...other GM's have survived losing better players at the time they lost them, Clippers lost Dirk, I lost Al Jeff, Knicks lost Shawn Marion, but you just keep using it as an excuse
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Sept 14, 2010 22:17:04 GMT -5
Proof of what? I even PMmed Saga asking him who he was taking and he said Boozer for sure because he had another PG at the time. So yes, I got lucky. But had I not taken Parker, I could have had someone else in the next draft but you can't cherry pick stats and assume things would have turned out the same had I never lost him. and you cant just assume things would have been great for you had you not lost him...I am doing no assuming of any kind...you have sucked here, its obvious...other GM's have survived losing better players at the time they lost them, Clippers lost Dirk, I lost Al Jeff, Knicks lost Shawn Marion, but you just keep using it as an excuse No but I can assume things would have been better with Tony Parker than without him.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Sept 14, 2010 22:17:18 GMT -5
his turnovers will go up at SF, just so you know So his turnover where 1.5 for an entire season and was 1.6 at PF and you come across the conclusion that his TO will be higher at SF over PF over a small amount of games? His turnovers last season were 2.7....
|
|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Sept 14, 2010 22:17:38 GMT -5
I couldn't post it was wack.
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Sept 14, 2010 22:17:42 GMT -5
1.7 and 2.7 is quite the difference
|
|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Sept 14, 2010 22:18:53 GMT -5
can someone tell me if thosegiveaway things like predictions get tallied?
|
|