|
|
Post by ashes on Apr 11, 2009 9:30:12 GMT -5
Strengths:[/u] Saavy post scorer with a strong 18 foot jump shot. Good free throw shooter. All-around good offensive player. Smart with the ball and can play in any offense. Above average foot speed. Good defender who can probably guard not only the 4, but slower 3s as well. Solid offensive rebounder. Strong player in the post. Weaknesses:[/u] Needs to improve rebounding to be an effective all around player. Not going to wow anyone with his athleticism. Not going to block shots and won't force many turnovers. Probably won't be effective at the 3. Not going to hit any threes. Scout's Take:[/u] Juwan Howard has been impressing scouts lately and moving up the draft boards. He has a good work ethic and a solid talent set. He should be a good starter one day, and a few scouts believe he has a chance at being an All Star. Should probably go mid lotto. Ratings:[/u] Juwan Howard PF 6'9'' 245 22 B C C B+ C+ B
|
|
|
|
Post by idle on Apr 11, 2009 10:00:14 GMT -5
Nice a big guy. Declare!
|
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on Apr 11, 2009 10:12:17 GMT -5
Juwan = C-Webb lite.
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on Apr 11, 2009 13:29:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Apr 11, 2009 13:50:21 GMT -5
please don't even mention these two in the same sentence...
|
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on Apr 11, 2009 13:59:52 GMT -5
It's a pretty good comparison though. Both are PF with good inside scoring, a great jumpshot and no shot blocking abilities. Plus i said lite.
C-Webb(entering draft)----------------B C- C B- B-
C-Webb lite (Juwan)-------------------B C C B C+
Only thing Cwebb has in those stats is better rebouding, while Juwan has better outside and defense...hmm
|
|
|
|
Post by W on Apr 11, 2009 15:28:06 GMT -5
please don't even mention these two in the same sentence... He'll be a bust? |
|
|
|
Post by theschmaranz on Apr 11, 2009 15:51:20 GMT -5
please don't even mention these two in the same sentence... He'll be a bust? He shouldn't be. While he never lived up to the absolutely retarded contract he wound up getting, he was a rather good scorer for years. |
|
|
|
Post by W on Apr 11, 2009 16:12:00 GMT -5
He shouldn't be. While he never lived up to the absolutely retarded contract he wound up getting, he was a rather good scorer for years. I'm aware he was good offensive player for the Bullets but it doesn't mean it will translate here in this league. |
|
|
|
Post by theschmaranz on Apr 11, 2009 16:15:11 GMT -5
He shouldn't be. While he never lived up to the absolutely retarded contract he wound up getting, he was a rather good scorer for years. I'm aware he was good offensive player for the Bullets but it doesn't mean it will translate here in this league. Well then shouldn't you ask in each and every thread in this section of the board if the player is a bust? |
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Apr 11, 2009 16:34:03 GMT -5
He, Cwebb and Strickland were pretty good at Washington, looks like a solid young player
|
|
|
|
Post by theschmaranz on Apr 11, 2009 16:46:38 GMT -5
That Bullets team could have been something had they held onto everyone. Remember, C-Webb and Juwan's backup was Sheed. That trio (when healthy)woulda been something to see.
|
|
|
|
Post by W on Apr 11, 2009 18:15:06 GMT -5
I'm aware he was good offensive player for the Bullets but it doesn't mean it will translate here in this league. Well then shouldn't you ask in each and every thread in this section of the board if the player is a bust? That's the first post I made in this section. What are you talking about? |
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Apr 11, 2009 18:16:01 GMT -5
looks great
|
|
|
|
Post by theschmaranz on Apr 11, 2009 18:43:12 GMT -5
Well then shouldn't you ask in each and every thread in this section of the board if the player is a bust? That's the first post I made in this section. What are you talking about? I guess my point wasn't stated well. Calling him a bust is just like calling everyone else in this draft a bust. That's all I was saying. Grant Hill or Jason Kidd could very well bust just as easily. |
|
