|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Apr 21, 2009 15:50:41 GMT -5
Warriors Trade:
96 owed 1st
Ed Pickney
Sonics Trade:
Ken Norman
Get a better defender/rebounder lose the offense(my team is averaging 105ppg so it's fine).
And get an owed pick.
Nice dealing. I accept
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 21, 2009 15:51:55 GMT -5
Warriors Trade: 96 owed 1st Ed Pickney Sonics Trade: Ken Norman Get a better defender/rebounder lose the offense(my team is averaging 105ppg so it's fine). And get an owed pick. Nice dealing. I accept I agree. Norman for Pinckney and an owed 1st by 1996. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Apr 21, 2009 15:56:13 GMT -5
rape
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Apr 21, 2009 16:00:11 GMT -5
you'd give a reasonable pick for Norman(31 and expiring) if you had a team?
|
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Apr 21, 2009 16:11:08 GMT -5
wow
|
|
|
|
Post by W on Apr 21, 2009 17:46:52 GMT -5
Warriors Trade: 96 owed 1st Ed Pickney Sonics Trade: Ken Norman Get a better defender/rebounder lose the offense(my team is averaging 105ppg so it's fine). And get an owed pick. Nice dealing. I accept I agree. Norman for Pinckney and an owed 1st by 1996. Not sure if I'm the only one that picked it up but CC only said by 1996. That would mean he is eligible to give a pick in 1995. That's why it is a rape. However, since Tmaczdaddy said in his trade, "96 owed 1st", it could mean he is expecting a 1996 first only. |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 21, 2009 17:47:32 GMT -5
nah we agreed it's an owed pick BY 1996 through pm
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 21, 2009 17:48:18 GMT -5
i dont see the rape
|
|
|
|
Post by W on Apr 21, 2009 17:48:59 GMT -5
Eh, sounds good to me. Just picking up something that I thought was missing.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Apr 21, 2009 17:52:51 GMT -5
Lol, I was joking. It's a completely irrelevant trade.
|
|
|
|
Post by W on Apr 21, 2009 18:08:07 GMT -5
yea, though CC still got the better end of the deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Apr 21, 2009 19:35:15 GMT -5
Wait a sec.
CC, when we were talking on AIM the whole time I kept asking for a 96 1st, right? And I didn't want to do your 95 1st
Then you PMed me saying owed 1st by 96, it was pretty much the same offer.
Then you said owed 96 1st + pickney for norman, so that's what made me post. Maybe I misread, but I pretty sure that's what you said and that's what made me do it
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 21, 2009 19:40:56 GMT -5
Read my pm. I offered pink + an owed 1st by whenever...then I guess you picked by 96 and posted it.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 21, 2009 19:43:09 GMT -5
I never said a 1st IN 96.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 21, 2009 19:43:52 GMT -5
My pm:
|
|
