|
|
Post by theschmaranz on Apr 22, 2009 17:36:52 GMT -5
If this isn't an argument for NOT doing the owed picks bullshit, I dunno what is.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 22, 2009 17:37:49 GMT -5
yea...CC quoted 96 owed first and then switched it up in his post. Thats what it should be, a first in 96 owed. i always quote when i agree to a deal. his fault for mis reading. i assumed he followed through with the offer i sent him (owed first by ____) |
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 22, 2009 17:37:54 GMT -5
Wait I posted 96 owed 1st and that's what I accepted to and then the deal ends up owed 1st by 96 somehow??? I agreed to 96 owed 1st NOT owed 1st by 96. Not that hard to understand, and no the deal never should have gone through. your fault for mis reading. i agreed to it because i thought you agreed to the offer i sent ya. you agreed to his post of a 96 owed first, nowhere did he put "by 96" |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 22, 2009 17:39:16 GMT -5
your fault for mis reading. i agreed to it because i thought you agreed to the offer i sent ya. you agreed to his post of a 96 owed first, nowhere did he put "by 96" HELLO because i thought he agreed to the deal i sent him via PM. |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 22, 2009 17:40:07 GMT -5
since when do i agree to deals (owed 1st IN that year) i always do owed BY and thats the vibe i got from him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 22, 2009 17:40:55 GMT -5
you agreed to his post of a 96 owed first, nowhere did he put "by 96" HELLO because i thought he posted to what i had in my mind. ok well if thats the case then it needs to be voided because you didn't agree to the same deal |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Apr 22, 2009 17:41:24 GMT -5
I'm voiding this shit. You guys are dumb.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 22, 2009 17:41:44 GMT -5
LOL his fault for mis reading
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Apr 22, 2009 17:43:02 GMT -5
tmacz is dumb for mis reading the simple offer i sent him.
fill in the blank:
pink and an owed 1st by whenever (pick a year) for norman
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Apr 22, 2009 17:43:18 GMT -5
His misread your PM, but you agreed to his post and then said something different in the same post as your agreement.
You're both dumb.
|
|
