|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on May 14, 2009 1:30:26 GMT -5
This deal should work
Deal 1:
Sonics Get:
Yinka Dare
Tony Bennett
Lakers get:
Gary Payton
Sean Rooks
Deal 2:
Sonics Get:
Celtics 96 1st
Lakers 96 1st
Lakers 97 1st
Lakers 2000 1st
Lakers get:
Chips
Good dealing with you Lakers. Sorry to see Payton go, but it had to happen sooner or later
|
|
|
|
Post by cllaatsch on May 14, 2009 1:36:27 GMT -5
Deal 1: Sonics Get: Yinka Dare 1 mill vet FA(doesn't matter who) Lakers get: Gary Payton Sean Rooks Deal 2: Sonics Get: Celtics 96 1st Lakers 96 1st Lakers 97 1st Lakers 2000 1st Lakers get: Chips Good dealing with you Lakers. Sorry to see Payton go, but it had to happen sooner or later Accept. Vet FA=Anthony Mason |
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 14, 2009 2:30:39 GMT -5
good lord
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on May 14, 2009 3:03:16 GMT -5
DAM big ass trade. Lakers get a stud PG, but I think they overpay here. If they could have kept Dare, I would have liked this for both.
But when they dealt him, their 96 and 97 1sts look like definite lottos. Seattle wins definitely.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on May 14, 2009 5:18:30 GMT -5
Holy fuck huge trade.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 14, 2009 11:21:37 GMT -5
Deal doesn't work. Lakers receive too much salary.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 14, 2009 12:46:14 GMT -5
Deal doesn't work. Lakers receive too much salary. Its the Vet FA thats doing it....it cuts the cap room by $1,000,000 when he's signed....$1,000,000 has to be cut from the deal eslewhere |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 14, 2009 12:51:36 GMT -5
Deal doesn't work. Lakers receive too much salary. Its the Vet FA thats doing it....it cuts the cap room by $1,000,000 when he's signed....$1,000,000 has to be cut from the deal eslewhere No, it's Sean Rooks that's doing it. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 14, 2009 12:58:01 GMT -5
Its the Vet FA thats doing it....it cuts the cap room by $1,000,000 when he's signed....$1,000,000 has to be cut from the deal eslewhere No, it's Sean Rooks that's doing it. They aren't recognizing that signing the VET FA doesn't help them though, because it drops the available salary cap room by $1,000,000. There is no point signing a Vet FA if a team is under the cap in a deal, unless they are right at the cap to put them over.....it appears that they think that by signing the Vet FA it brings salaries within 7,700,000 but by signing him, the Lakers cap room drops to 6,700,000 making the Vet FA worthless. Yes they could fix it by taking out Rooks, or by sending an extra 1 million from the Lakers side to the Sonics |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 14, 2009 14:44:04 GMT -5
The deal doesn't work even without the Vet FA. I've tried it. That's why it's Rooks that is the problem, not the Vet FA. That Lakers are receiving too much salary.
|
|
|
|
Post by cllaatsch on May 14, 2009 15:00:34 GMT -5
So if I send Bennett and Thompson (the PGs) then the deal works?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 14, 2009 15:08:45 GMT -5
The deal doesn't work even without the Vet FA. I've tried it. That's why it's Rooks that is the problem, not the Vet FA. That Lakers are receiving too much salary. I understand that, my point was they thought the Vet FA would make up the $1million difference in salary, but in reality he has no effect on the trade, because LA is under the cap, and signing him reduces the amount of cap room by the amount that they needed to save. They didn't recognize that, but by removing Rooks, or by the Lakers adding $1,000,000 to the deal to send to the Sonics, it would work.... |
|
|
|
Post by DB on May 14, 2009 15:48:02 GMT -5
Nice deal for the lakers, to bad you dealt dare though.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on May 14, 2009 16:26:54 GMT -5
This deal should work
Deal 1:
Sonics Get:
Yinka Dare
Tony Bennett
Lakers get:
Gary Payton
Sean Rooks
Deal 2:
Sonics Get:
Celtics 96 1st
Lakers 96 1st
Lakers 97 1st
Lakers 2000 1st
Lakers get:
Chips
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 14, 2009 17:01:29 GMT -5
Lakers get Chipper?
Poor chipper...
|
|
