|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on May 21, 2009 14:28:16 GMT -5
U guys are the ones that gave him 5s lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on May 21, 2009 14:29:50 GMT -5
I dont think the 5 is the question of complain from these guys. Its the fact that we did a lot of work to and should be rewarded for it. Not saying we should get 5 because its not our idea to do this round table. However, we should maybe get 4 because of the work we put in.
Maybe everyone gets bumped up one, but if you really didn't do crap you should still get a 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on May 21, 2009 15:48:23 GMT -5
U guys are the ones that gave him 5s lol.  Didn't really address the complaint. We gave the article a 5...IMO the article had numerous authors, all of which should get around the same amount of credit. Giving the guy who simply posted the responses 2-3x the credit isn't fair. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 21, 2009 15:53:10 GMT -5
I can live with Don getting 5, and the rest of us 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on May 21, 2009 16:22:10 GMT -5
I can live with Don getting 5, and the rest of us 4. |
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on May 21, 2009 16:39:09 GMT -5
I can live with Don getting 5, and the rest of us 4. |
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on May 21, 2009 16:41:13 GMT -5
Well whatever commish decides please use the upgrade to Dare's inside scoring
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on May 21, 2009 16:49:58 GMT -5
please put my towards Marshall's Jump Shot.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on May 21, 2009 17:53:22 GMT -5
It took me maybe 15 minutes to answer all the questions with good details and thought. I don't see why I'd deserve a 5 or 4 for that...
Anyway, we can maybe work out the details for future roundtables. But the scoring for this one is determined and final. If one of you guys has ideas how we should score these in the future, please start a new thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 21, 2009 19:06:06 GMT -5
there is no reason for any of us to do this if we're going to get 2 points for this.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on May 21, 2009 19:21:28 GMT -5
The points u get from a roundtable (other than don) don't count as an article. So I think theres still an incentive tbh..
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 21, 2009 23:03:04 GMT -5
there is no reason for any of us to do this if we're going to get 2 points for this. Your points don't count as an article. If you don't want to do it, then don't do it. If you want more points, post more elaborate answers, not a bunch of one-liners. Martinez, the Lil Wayne of the roundtable. |
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on May 22, 2009 0:39:13 GMT -5
The points u get from a roundtable (other than don) don't count as an article. So I think theres still an incentive tbh.. Good point didn't think of that. |
|
|
|
Post by DB on May 22, 2009 12:28:38 GMT -5
sent to ashes
|
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on May 22, 2009 13:01:30 GMT -5
|
|
Didn't really address the complaint. We gave the article a 5...IMO the article had numerous authors, all of which should get around the same amount of credit. Giving the guy who simply posted the responses 2-3x the credit isn't fair.
