Bullets Block: New and Improved

[donatello2424]

10 Dale Davis C 27 6'11'' 230 B- D+ F+ A- A- C
557 John Salley PF 32 6'11'' 230 B- C- D+ B B- D
555 Chris Webber PF 23 6'10'' 260 A- C- B A- B+ B
530 Ed Pinckney PF 33 6'9'' 195 C C+ C- A- B+ D
299 Jeff Webster SF 25 6'8'' 232 C+ A- C- B C+ C
507 Corliss Williamson SF 22 6'7'' 245 B C- D+ C+ C+ C
230 Jevon Crudup SF 24 6'6'' 252 B C- D+ C+ C D
412 Derek Harper SG 35 6'4'' 185 C+ B A- B D D
638 Kerry Kittles SG 22 6'5'' 183 B- B C B C- B
256 Anthony Peeler SG 26 6'4'' 215 B- C+ C+ B+ C C
533 Eric Piatkowski SG 25 6'7'' 215 C A- C C+ C- B
61 Alberto Angulo SG 26 6'4'' 201 C B- C B D+ D
585 John Starks PG 31 6'3'' 180 C B B+ A- C C
433 Avery Johnson PG 31 5'10'' 175 C C+ A- A- D+ C
196 Anthony Goldwire PG 24 6'1'' 185 C+ B B+ C+ C C

*Need a backup combo guard? I got Derek Harper
*Need some big men? I got Davis, Pinckney, and Salley
*Some a pg or two? I have Goldwire, Starks, and Johnson
*Need some backup wings? I got a shit load.

[donatello2424]

bump

[tmaczdaddy]

I like Kittles

[donatello2424]

Jun 5, 2009 20:01:14 GMT -5 tmaczdaddy said:

I like Kittles

I only like your picks.

[Spencer]

Any interest in Radja, Armstrong or MAR?

[donatello2424]

Jun 6, 2009 0:05:53 GMT -5 Spencer said:

Any interest in Radja, Armstrong or MAR?

No. I want improvements.

[donatello2424]

updated

[tmaczdaddy]

You like Dee Brown 27 B- B B+ A- C- C. 24ppg/8.3apg

[donatello2424]

Jun 8, 2009 14:39:03 GMT -5 tmaczdaddy said:

You like Dee Brown 27 B- B B+ A- C- C. 24ppg/8.3apg

Depends on the cost.

[tmaczdaddy]

The Web + pick/s

[donatello2424]

Jun 8, 2009 15:30:19 GMT -5 tmaczdaddy said:

The Web + pick/s

That would be a no. Webber is worth so much more than Dee and he isn't enough of an improvement over Starks that it would merit me giving up a first.

[tmaczdaddy]

Jun 8, 2009 15:51:37 GMT -5 donatello2424 said:

Jun 8, 2009 15:30:19 GMT -5 tmaczdaddy said:

The Web + pick/s

That would be a no. Webber is worth so much more than Dee and he isn't enough of an improvement over Starks that it would merit me giving up a first.

I meant Webster

[donatello2424]

Jun 8, 2009 16:04:11 GMT -5 tmaczdaddy said:

Jun 8, 2009 15:51:37 GMT -5 donatello2424 said:

That would be a no. Webber is worth so much more than Dee and he isn't enough of an improvement over Starks that it would merit me giving up a first.

I meant Webster

I just don't really see the point in trading an expiring for an expiring when I am not a contender.