|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Jan 14, 2009 11:04:28 GMT -5
Dennis Rodman SF 6'7'' 210 29 C+ C- C- B A B He won the defensive player of the year award in 1990 and 91 He should have A+ defense A+ rebounding and probably C inside scoring if possible. Can you make an A+ defender in FBB when he doesn't block shots or get many steals? He should have great position defense and great rebounding. C+ D C A- A+ would be my best guess for Rodman.... |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 14, 2009 11:05:09 GMT -5
Nice work on the file. I think overall there are too many guys with great defense. Id move a bunch of A+ to A and A to A- etc. Plus guys like Mullin and Mike Adams had a lot of steals but werent A defenders.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 14, 2009 11:05:56 GMT -5
Dennis Rodman SF 6'7'' 210 29 C+ C- C- B A B He won the defensive player of the year award in 1990 and 91 He should have A+ defense A+ rebounding and probably C inside scoring if possible. Can you make an A+ defender in FBB when he doesn't block shots or get many steals? He should have great position defense and great rebounding. C+ D C A- A+ would be my best guess for Rodman.... He should be extremely strong and jump well, and all his defense categories besides blocks and steals should be amazing. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jan 14, 2009 11:06:45 GMT -5
Rodman was 6'8 and 240lbs when he was in the NBA....
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 14, 2009 11:10:27 GMT -5
Also weird that Mullin is a B+ B scorer. He didnt shoot well this year, but he was a sick shooter. Might be better of being B A- for the purpose of this league. I remember this file because we used the base as the file for BBS90!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Jan 14, 2009 11:11:28 GMT -5
Michael Adams is so overated its funny. He was essentially the #1 option on a horrible team. Yeah he put up a lot of points and assists. He also shot horribly and turned it over a lot.
B+ B- A- A- D+ would be perfectly fine for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 14, 2009 11:14:33 GMT -5
Michael Adams is so overated its funny. He was essentially the #1 option on a horrible team. Yeah he put up a lot of points and assists. He also shot horribly and turned it over a lot. B+ B- A- A- D+ would be perfectly fine for him. I was thinkin B B A- B D+ C |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jan 14, 2009 11:16:37 GMT -5
This is going to be sick.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Jan 14, 2009 11:16:43 GMT -5
B B or B+ B- is debatable.
|
|
|
|
Post by W on Jan 14, 2009 11:22:45 GMT -5
My guess is that the reason some ratings are higher than they are supposed to be is because the NBA had less teams back in 1990. I think it was only 27 teams and with FBB at 29 teams the file may have been edited to spread the talent around equally.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jan 14, 2009 11:23:19 GMT -5
what?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 14, 2009 11:25:19 GMT -5
My guess is that the reason some ratings are higher than they are supposed to be is because the NBA had less teams back in 1990. I think it was only 27 teams and with FBB at 29 teams the file may have been edited to spread the talent around equally. Its based off of 1 year stats, so the ratings are skewed. Also defense grades are always higher in these files because they give high positional defense to those with lots of steals or blocks. |
|
|
|
Post by W on Jan 14, 2009 11:25:33 GMT -5
With FBB having more teams than the NBA, their is less talent to go around. So some ratings may have been adjusted to make sure at least every team gets some talent. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 14, 2009 11:25:40 GMT -5
B B or B+ B- is debatable. All ratings are debatable. |
|
|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Jan 14, 2009 11:26:21 GMT -5
lol.....27 to 29 is only 24 more active roster spots. That isn't that much.
|
|
