|
Post by W on Jan 14, 2009 11:27:05 GMT -5
My guess is that the reason some ratings are higher than they are supposed to be is because the NBA had less teams back in 1990. I think it was only 27 teams and with FBB at 29 teams the file may have been edited to spread the talent around equally. Its based off of 1 year stats, so the ratings are skewed. Also defense grades are always higher in these files because they give high positional defense to those with lots of steals or blocks. gotcha, but with players that have lower ratings than they are supposed to...their potential is most likely higher
|
|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Jan 14, 2009 11:30:30 GMT -5
B B or B+ B- is debatable. All ratings are debatable. 99.99% of things are debatable. B B or B+ B- is reasonably debatable
|
|
|
Post by RBxDERRRTY! on Jan 14, 2009 11:43:32 GMT -5
Amazingly overrated.. Almost half the league has A- or better defense. I think it might need a little toning down. Like 10 guys with A+? There aren't ten smashmouth defenders, maybe 5.
And the guy that said MJ needed another A+ is a retard.
|
|
|
Post by Hannah Montana on Jan 14, 2009 12:04:35 GMT -5
Wow, great job ashes. Looks awesome.
|
|
|
Post by W on Jan 14, 2009 12:08:39 GMT -5
It does look awesome.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Jan 14, 2009 12:57:09 GMT -5
I'd be happy to make some changes if you ask nicely.
And Spencer is right, the 1990 stats this file was based off of skewed some ratings pretty bad, especially defense and PGs. I went around editting as changing a lot of the ratings, there were plenty of stupid ones.
I'll fiddle with it later. Cheers.
|
|
|
Post by RBxDERRRTY! on Jan 14, 2009 12:59:05 GMT -5
gracias
|
|
|
Post by W on Jan 14, 2009 13:03:17 GMT -5
I'd be happy to make some changes if you ask nicely. And Spencer is right, the 1990 stats this file was based off of skewed some ratings pretty bad, especially defense and PGs. I went around editting as changing a lot of the ratings, there were plenty of stupid ones. I'll fiddle with it later. Cheers. thanks
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 14, 2009 15:28:34 GMT -5
You guys did a great job on it
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Jan 14, 2009 15:36:10 GMT -5
Give ashes credit guys, all I did was edit some potentials..
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Jan 14, 2009 15:36:42 GMT -5
ducky i need to be an admin thanks. Y? You don't even want to be in this league.
|
|
CWizz
Waterboy
I like dick, cuz I suck!
I'm the worst GM ever!
Posts: 278
|
Post by CWizz on Jan 14, 2009 17:50:34 GMT -5
I personally like the ratings, everyone covered the ones that should've been covered
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Jan 14, 2009 19:26:51 GMT -5
David Robinson looks nice!! Michael Adams is a beast!!
|
|
|
Post by mops on Jan 14, 2009 20:17:27 GMT -5
Sir Charles looks a tad under rated. He was just entering his prime and didnt play his best basketball until a few more years. I'd give him at the minimum more than C potential.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Jan 14, 2009 20:18:52 GMT -5
Sir Charles looks a tad under rated. He was just entering his prime and didnt play his best basketball until a few more years. I'd give him at the minimum more than C potential. Potential is like Transformers.
|
|