|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 18:59:14 GMT -5
And enough of the bullshit schedule argument with Texas, as if it's Texas's fault. Yeah, it's our fault Arkansas, one of those SEC teams, pussied out and cancelled their game with Texas in favor of the weaker Texas A&M. Oh, it's also our fault Utah cancelled on us as well. Please.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Nov 9, 2009 20:34:40 GMT -5
How is Ingram overrated? Get the fuck out of here. I doubt you even get the Bama games in Oregon lol. Alabama put up a ton of points against shitty teams like Texas does we have just been playing top 25 defenses the past few games, something Texas hasn't seen all year. Dude SEC games are on CBS all the time. Boring ass shit. I don't have cable either so I'm stuck with gay notre dame on NBC, boring SEC on CBS, and usually some solid games on ABC. Ingram is good, but not #1 in Heisman good. And Texas would beat Alabama. Alabama's top defense is overblown. The offenses you guys go up against are a joke. You've played 2 top 45 offenses in the country (going by yards per game): North Texas and Arkansas. North Texas is the best offense you guys have faced all year.  Sad. Texas has played against 3 top 35 offense, and other solid ones. So yeah, Texas and Alabama both have solid defenses. But Alabama has played easier competition, and Texas' offense is loaded. Good luck slowing them down. Ingram is in the Heisman race, not everyone is calling him the front runner, but he isn't overrated thats for sure. Everyone knows we are running the ball and he stills runs all over everyone. Lol at our defense being overblown. We made Ryan Mallet and Jevan Snead look awful. And we have faced 2 top 45 offenses and Texas has played 3...But we have played MUCH better defenses then Texas. Lol at easier competition though, that one made me lol. SEC is miles ahead of the Big 12. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 9, 2009 20:39:20 GMT -5
I bet if Boise St. lost a game (LOL) and dropped below Oregon, you'd have no problem with it, you fucking hypocrite.  Thing is for Oregon and USC body of work is even, for Boise State Oregon, body of Work is heavily in Oregon's favor. |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 20:51:30 GMT -5
I bet if Boise St. lost a game (LOL) and dropped below Oregon, you'd have no problem with it, you fucking hypocrite. No shit, Boise has like what the 90th toughest schedule? Oregon has the 7th toughest schedule. Since when does bating UC Davis, Utah State, and San Jose State match victories over USC, Cal, and Utah? |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 21:39:32 GMT -5
You're just being a hypocrite. You use what you want to apply whenever it's in your favor.
Next time be 9-0 by now instead of 7-2.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 21:40:10 GMT -5
I bet if Boise St. lost a game (LOL) and dropped below Oregon, you'd have no problem with it, you fucking hypocrite. Thing is for Oregon and USC body of work is even, for Boise State Oregon, body of Work is heavily in Oregon's favor. The thing is you still lost to Boise St. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 21:40:59 GMT -5
Texas has teams pussying out to play us. We can only play the teams that have the balls to step up against us.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 21:42:11 GMT -5
Dude SEC games are on CBS all the time. Boring ass shit. I don't have cable either so I'm stuck with gay notre dame on NBC, boring SEC on CBS, and usually some solid games on ABC. Ingram is good, but not #1 in Heisman good. And Texas would beat Alabama. Alabama's top defense is overblown. The offenses you guys go up against are a joke. You've played 2 top 45 offenses in the country (going by yards per game): North Texas and Arkansas. North Texas is the best offense you guys have faced all year. Sad. Texas has played against 3 top 35 offense, and other solid ones. So yeah, Texas and Alabama both have solid defenses. But Alabama has played easier competition, and Texas' offense is loaded. Good luck slowing them down. Ingram is in the Heisman race, not everyone is calling him the front runner, but he isn't overrated thats for sure. Everyone knows we are running the ball and he stills runs all over everyone. Lol at our defense being overblown. We made Ryan Mallet and Jevan Snead look awful. And we have faced 2 top 45 offenses and Texas has played 3...But we have played MUCH better defenses then Texas. Lol at easier competition though, that one made me lol. SEC is miles ahead of the Big 12. With referees miles behind Jr. High Schools! Must be nice! |
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Nov 9, 2009 21:46:16 GMT -5
Ingram is in the Heisman race, not everyone is calling him the front runner, but he isn't overrated thats for sure. Everyone knows we are running the ball and he stills runs all over everyone. Lol at our defense being overblown. We made Ryan Mallet and Jevan Snead look awful. And we have faced 2 top 45 offenses and Texas has played 3...But we have played MUCH better defenses then Texas. Lol at easier competition though, that one made me lol. SEC is miles ahead of the Big 12. With referees miles behind Jr. High Schools! Must be nice! We will just have to wait and see, I do believe Florida or Alabama would beat Texas though. |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 21:47:51 GMT -5
You're just being a hypocrite. You use what you want to apply whenever it's in your favor. Next time be 9-0 by now instead of 7-2. We would be if we could play Utah State every year. And it's not hypocritical, I apply the same theory to every team. If a team beats another team and they have the same amount of losses, then obviously the team who beat the other should be in front (UNLESS the team that loss has a much harder schedule). |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 21:48:51 GMT -5
You're just being a hypocrite. You use what you want to apply whenever it's in your favor. Next time be 9-0 by now instead of 7-2. We would be if we could play Utah State every year. And it's not hypocritical, I apply the same theory to every team. If a team beats another team and they have the same amount of losses, then obviously the team who beat the other should be in front (UNLESS the team that loss has a much harder schedule). Pretty convenient. |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 21:49:56 GMT -5
We would be if we could play Utah State every year. And it's not hypocritical, I apply the same theory to every team. If a team beats another team and they have the same amount of losses, then obviously the team who beat the other should be in front (UNLESS the team that loss has a much harder schedule). Pretty convenient. Pretty logical. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 21:50:36 GMT -5
Except in the case of Boise losing, they'd have one less less than Oregon while still having the victory over Oregon. All about the W.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 21:52:03 GMT -5
How is a hypothetical one-loss Boise with a victory over Oregon being behind a two-loss Oregon logical to you when you're bitching about a same-loss USC being ahead of Oregon. Give me a break. |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 21:52:48 GMT -5
Except in the case of Boise losing, they'd have one less less than Oregon while still having the victory over Oregon. All about the W. That's a bit more debatable. I personally think we should still be in front of Boise, but if someone doesn't have us in front of them, whatever, it's understandable. But for us to be behind USC and tOSU? Laughable... I hope we play tOSU in the Rose Bowl. Wouldn't that be fun? |
|
Sad.
