|
|
Post by AllHailManiac on Nov 8, 2009 23:44:34 GMT -5
If Oregon wins the Rose Bowl, they will. I meant this week! Pitt is #8 in the AP, #9 in the Coaches Poll. Oregon is #14 in the AP, #16 in the Coaches Poll. Ducky, you're a moron! BCS is essentially meaningless for both Pitt and Oregon. Neither team is a national championship contender and neither team will get an at-large bid. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 8, 2009 23:54:40 GMT -5
I meant this week! Pitt is #8 in the AP, #9 in the Coaches Poll. Oregon is #14 in the AP, #16 in the Coaches Poll. Ducky, you're a moron! BCS is essentially meaningless for both Pitt and Oregon. Neither team is a national championship contender and neither team will get an at-large bid. To be honest, this is a good point. Normally, I go with AP and Coaches' Polls for true rankings. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 9, 2009 0:48:56 GMT -5
Ducky, you're a moron! BCS is essentially meaningless for both Pitt and Oregon. Neither team is a national championship contender and neither team will get an at-large bid. To be honest, this is a good point. Normally, I go with AP and Coaches' Polls for true rankings. All polls are BS...see that Oregon, with two losses, too Stanford (better than Washington) and Boise State...is behind USC who has lost to Washington, who Oregon demolished, and Oregon...lol....College Football badly needs a playoff, and Body of work is even for both teams, with Utah USC=Ohio State, Notre Dame |
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Nov 9, 2009 1:21:26 GMT -5
lol, I love when Ducky talk shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 4:06:21 GMT -5
lol, I love when Ducky talk shit. I know it turns u on bebe, but try to keep it to yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 4:07:27 GMT -5
I meant this week! Pitt is #8 in the AP, #9 in the Coaches Poll. Oregon is #14 in the AP, #16 in the Coaches Poll. Ducky, you're a moron! BCS is essentially meaningless for both Pitt and Oregon. Neither team is a national championship contender and neither team will get an at-large bid. LOL BCS is the poll everyone goes by. Who cares if we aren't playing for a national championship, it's still the ranking widely used. |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 4:08:43 GMT -5
Ducky, you're a moron! BCS is essentially meaningless for both Pitt and Oregon. Neither team is a national championship contender and neither team will get an at-large bid. To be honest, this is a good point. Normally, I go with AP and Coaches' Polls for true rankings. Right cuz the coaches have USC 6 spots in front of Oregon.. and tOSU 3 spots in front of USC.  At least the BCS has us only a few spots behind USC. And USC in front of tOSU. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 4:23:34 GMT -5
To be honest, this is a good point. Normally, I go with AP and Coaches' Polls for true rankings. Right cuz the coaches have USC 6 spots in front of Oregon.. and tOSU 3 spots in front of USC. At least the BCS has us only a few spots behind USC. And USC in front of tOSU. Darn those coaches knowing less than you about college football! |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 4:27:15 GMT -5
Right cuz the coaches have USC 6 spots in front of Oregon.. and tOSU 3 spots in front of USC. At least the BCS has us only a few spots behind USC. And USC in front of tOSU. Darn those coaches knowing less than you about college football! The problem is that the coaches are all pretty biased. Coaches always put their team and their conferences higher. Also, tons of coaches dont get to see lots of teams ever play. I'd definitely prefer AP voting over coaches voting. AP voters tend to be a bit less biased, and see more football games then coaches. |
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 9, 2009 4:29:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 4:37:14 GMT -5
Darn those coaches knowing less than you about college football! The problem is that the coaches are all pretty biased. Coaches always put their team and their conferences higher. Also, tons of coaches dont get to see lots of teams ever play. I'd definitely prefer AP voting over coaches voting. AP voters tend to be a bit less biased, and see more football games then coaches. Weird. I thought I said AP and Coaches'. Must've been mistaken. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 4:38:30 GMT -5
Also, lol at Ducky for being pissed USC is higher than Oregon despite losing to them when you were crying about Boise St. being higher than Oregon before the loss to Stanford.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 9, 2009 4:39:11 GMT -5
I bet if Boise St. lost a game (LOL) and dropped below Oregon, you'd have no problem with it, you fucking hypocrite.  |
|
|
|
Post by mops on Nov 9, 2009 13:05:41 GMT -5
Well Blount is back.
|
|
|
|
Post by AllHailManiac on Nov 9, 2009 14:03:10 GMT -5
Darn those coaches knowing less than you about college football! The problem is that the coaches are all pretty biased. Coaches always put their team and their conferences higher. Also, tons of coaches dont get to see lots of teams ever play. I'd definitely prefer AP voting over coaches voting. AP voters tend to be a bit less biased, and see more football games then coaches. Ok, well, the coaches and the AP voters feel that Pitt > Oregon. And, for that matter, the BCS! |
|
