|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Oct 16, 2009 16:00:41 GMT -5
I never made a formal offer to him and Nazr and two picks is better than what you offered anyway. I offered him Stack, he said no interest, because Stack could help him win, and just a second ago it was Nazr or two picks...HE didn't want players who could help him win...Nazr=player to help him win...he wanted prospects. More strawman arguments? If Nazr would have helped him win, he could have dealt Nazr away for picks. |
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Oct 16, 2009 16:01:36 GMT -5
I don't see how this is anything to argue so hard over  LOL, all I said was the clippers made a horrific deal and the nets went crazy. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 16, 2009 16:02:23 GMT -5
I offered him Stack, he said no interest, because Stack could help him win, and just a second ago it was Nazr or two picks...HE didn't want players who could help him win...Nazr=player to help him win...he wanted prospects. More strawman arguments? If Nazr would have helped him win, he could have dealt Nazr away for picks. So he could have gotten what, 4 picks, for a lotto first...although, none of those picks would have been lotto would they have.... |
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Oct 16, 2009 16:04:17 GMT -5
More strawman arguments? If Nazr would have helped him win, he could have dealt Nazr away for picks. So he could have gotten what, 4 picks, for a lotto first...although, none of those picks would have been lotto would they have.... Nazr would have landed at least one lotto pick, yet you're here assuming Nazr and two picks is better than the crap you gave up. |
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Oct 16, 2009 16:06:20 GMT -5
Brophdog88, I'm not sure why you need to justify to yourself that the Clippers didn't make a bad deal. It's pretty ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 16, 2009 16:06:35 GMT -5
So he could have gotten what, 4 picks, for a lotto first...although, none of those picks would have been lotto would they have.... Nazr would have landed at least one lotto pick, yet you're here assuming Nazr and two picks is better than the crap you gave up. Funny as I said, cause you were offering Nazr or two picks..talk is cheap, I would do that trade, pre trade deadline |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 16, 2009 16:06:57 GMT -5
Brophdog88, I'm not sure why you need to justify to yourself that the Nets didn't make a bad deal. It's pretty ridiculous. Entertainment... |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 16, 2009 16:07:56 GMT -5
actually I wouldn't make that trade, Nazr is expiring and would leave, cause I dunno if I would give him Max
|
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Oct 16, 2009 16:09:07 GMT -5
Nazr would have landed at least one lotto pick, yet you're here assuming Nazr and two picks is better than the crap you gave up. Funny as I said, cause you were offering Nazr or two picks..talk is cheap, I would do that trade, pre trade deadline Again, no incentive to make a trade with the team that owns its own pick. If you don't see this, I'm not sure what to tell you. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 16, 2009 16:11:18 GMT -5
Funny as I said, cause you were offering Nazr or two picks..talk is cheap, I would do that trade, pre trade deadline Again, no incentive to make a trade with the team that owns its own pick. If you don't see this, I'm not sure what to tell you. I would not do that trade, because if Nazr tests FA he would leave, however, what I am saying is I would do two firsts and Nazr...and not play Nazr...if Nazr wasn't expiring. |
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Oct 16, 2009 16:11:33 GMT -5
actually I wouldn't make that trade, Nazr is expiring and would leave, cause I dunno if I would give him Max Notch this up with more assumptions. Let's tally them: 1) You had the best offer 2) No one else had the best offer 3) Clippers shouldn't make a trade block because you had the best deal 4) Nazr would leave Not to mention the fact that Nazr would leave is a strawman argument in itself. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 16, 2009 16:15:04 GMT -5
actually I wouldn't make that trade, Nazr is expiring and would leave, cause I dunno if I would give him Max Notch this up with more assumptions. Let's tally them: 1) You had the best offer 2) No one else had the best offer 3) Clippers shouldn't make a trade block because you had the best deal 4) Nazr would leave Not to mention the fact that Nazr would leave is a strawman argument in itself. I never said the Clipps shouldn't have made a trade Block, I said YOU CAN'T assume they would have gotten a better offer, had they put one up, cause with multiple teams knowing I was attempting to get it back, he didn't get an offer. If Nazr tests FA..somebody is going to overpay him...I am not saying that he will leave, but I wouldn't want to pay max. I would have to overpay him in order to keep him in New Jersey if I had him. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 16, 2009 16:16:07 GMT -5
actually I wouldn't make that trade, Nazr is expiring and if he tests FA I would lose him, cause I dunno if I would give him Max fixed as to what I meant it to say |
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Oct 16, 2009 16:17:50 GMT -5
Notch this up with more assumptions. Let's tally them: 1) You had the best offer 2) No one else had the best offer 3) Clippers shouldn't make a trade block because you had the best deal 4) Nazr would leave Not to mention the fact that Nazr would leave is a strawman argument in itself. I never said the Clipps shouldn't have made a trade Block, I said YOU CAN'T assume they would have gotten a better offer, had they put one up, cause with multiple teams knowing I was attempting to get it back, he didn't get an offer. If Nazr tests FA..somebody is going to overpay him...I am not saying that he will leave, but I wouldn't want to pay max. I would have to overpay him in order to keep him in New Jersey if I had him. I don't need to assume they wouldn't have gotten a better offer, I said they should make a trade block and see who gives them the best offer be it you or someone else. You, however, keep on assuming nobody could beat your offer which is an illogical fallacy based on the premise that you don't know what other teams would have offered. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 16, 2009 16:21:31 GMT -5
I never said the Clipps shouldn't have made a trade Block, I said YOU CAN'T assume they would have gotten a better offer, had they put one up, cause with multiple teams knowing I was attempting to get it back, he didn't get an offer. If Nazr tests FA..somebody is going to overpay him...I am not saying that he will leave, but I wouldn't want to pay max. I would have to overpay him in order to keep him in New Jersey if I had him. I don't need to assume they wouldn't have gotten a better offer, I said they should make a trade block and see who gives them the best offer be it you or someone else. You, however, keep on assuming nobody could beat your offer which is an illogical fallacy based on the premise that you don't know what other teams would have offered. Actually you did say they would have gotten a better offer had they made a trade block...but thats an assumption...my assumption is that he had not gotten a better offer yet...maybe he should have posted a trade block, but he didn't nor did he get a better offer. My offer was not the end all be all of offers...and if you would have traded Nazr and two picks for my first...you are idiotic, cause I would then have traded so that I could win |
|
