|
|
Post by kobe24 on Nov 6, 2009 15:56:40 GMT -5
*Mavs cut Harvey Grant, Dee Brown, Loy Vaught before the deal.
Warriors Get:
Chris Webber
Joe Johnson
Mavericks Get:
Tyson Chandler
John Salmons
Sharone Wright
Vet. FA
Hawks 2003 First
Warriors 2003 First
I accept, Webber has like no value now so w/e. Chandler is only 19, looks like he is going to be a great anchor for my team. I like JJ, but I also like Salmons, he is only a rookie and almost has the same scoring ratings as JJ and has much better defense. And two firsts in a good draft. DAMON, ROBERTS AND SMITH NEED TO GO NEXT.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Nov 6, 2009 16:00:29 GMT -5
Bumping this because it's bigger than my owed pick trade.
Nice deal both sides.
|
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Nov 6, 2009 16:02:39 GMT -5
At the risk of sounding bitter (which I'm not), why are they getting Joe Johnson as well? Hilarious imo
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Nov 6, 2009 16:03:19 GMT -5
Salmons is only a rookie and looks better then JJ.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Nov 6, 2009 16:05:14 GMT -5
He didn't look that great last night.
Oh wait, that was in real life.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 6, 2009 16:06:42 GMT -5
Warriors get the two best players, so Warriors win easily.
Tyson has nice ratings, but he can't block shots and he can't score. Pretty bad for a 7 footer.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Nov 6, 2009 16:08:45 GMT -5
Warriors win big
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Nov 6, 2009 16:11:29 GMT -5
Would much rather have a rookie with B- B C+ B ratings over a second year guy with B B C+ C ratings(at SG). Like no one wanted Webber, it came down to basically two offers and I decided to go with 2 firsts and the younger guy. Webber is a loser anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 6, 2009 16:13:10 GMT -5
Would much rather have a rookie with B- B C+ B ratings over a second year guy with B B C+ C ratings(at SG). Like no one wanted Webber, it came down to basically two offers and I decided to go with 2 firsts and the younger guy. Webber is a loser anyway. Ehh still though. If you didn't give up JJ, this deal would have been solid. But when you give up JJ, who is about the same to Tyson in terms of value, then you pretty much defeat the purpose of this trade, and Warriors win big. |
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Nov 6, 2009 16:15:52 GMT -5
Joe Johnson has the more familiar name. But Salmons has been through one less TC and already looks better.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 6, 2009 16:16:52 GMT -5
Tyson > JJ
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Nov 6, 2009 16:18:16 GMT -5
Having the league file > Not having the league file Tyson's output is pretty nasty compared to JJ. Obviously he has the D, but put JJ in my offense, and he makes Kobe look bad defensively. |
|
|
|
Post by House on Nov 6, 2009 16:22:11 GMT -5
Having the league file > Not having the league file Tyson's output is pretty nasty compared to JJ. Obviously he has the D, but put JJ in my offense, and he makes Kobe look bad defensively. He ain't IN yo' offense boy. But it's true, JJ did make some people look bad as a rookie. He'll be good. |
|
|
|
Post by aar on Nov 6, 2009 16:35:16 GMT -5
I agree
Thrilled with this deal
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 6, 2009 16:58:37 GMT -5
I agree Thrilled with this deal You effin should be. |
|
