|
|
Post by ashes on Jan 31, 2010 19:38:24 GMT -5
Stop bitching about Ducky's grading. If you don't like it, just don't do them. Good lord. They are free points for minimal effort and don't count towards your articles. I'd hate to just have to discontinue it all together.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Jan 31, 2010 20:14:44 GMT -5
ooo, they don't count? nice
no more complaining from me
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Jan 31, 2010 22:38:19 GMT -5
thanks bebe. If you really want more than 1 point, please type more than 50 words per answer. An answer of the length of this message that I am typing up now is basically hardly any work other than just reading and writing something. I can do that in 30 seconds...
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Jan 31, 2010 23:00:32 GMT -5
thanks bebe. If you really want more than 1 point, please type more than 50 words per answer. An answer of the length of this message that I am typing up now is basically hardly any work other than just reading and writing something. I can do that in 30 seconds... you shouldn't give points based on words though. When round tables get handed out it's not always a simple question and answer. Sometimes you have to research stuff or look up stuff. Free writing 50 words is easy, like you just did. Getting asked a question and researching to come up w/ a good answer is a lot more work. I doubt you even read all the answers tbh, you just looked at the amount someone wrote. |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Jan 31, 2010 23:03:22 GMT -5
If you feel someone deserves a +1 or +2 then that's fine, i can't argue with that. But you're only reasoning thus far has been word count...
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Jan 31, 2010 23:14:01 GMT -5
it's content and if you don't have a simple word count than its impossible to answer the question with any sort of content. I don't think anyone would argue against Ducky's merit. If everyone was deserving of a +3 then he'd obviously give it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Jan 31, 2010 23:17:16 GMT -5
some people just ramble tbh, they say the same thing but just drag it for longer...
Some people just say the same things with a lot less words. I'm not saying i'm one of them, but it's just an example of word count being looked at a little too much.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Feb 1, 2010 0:37:06 GMT -5
yeah it depends on what is all being said, duckys judgement should be enough though if he read it
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Feb 1, 2010 3:31:25 GMT -5
thanks bebe. If you really want more than 1 point, please type more than 50 words per answer. An answer of the length of this message that I am typing up now is basically hardly any work other than just reading and writing something. I can do that in 30 seconds... you shouldn't give points based on words though. When round tables get handed out it's not always a simple question and answer. Sometimes you have to research stuff or look up stuff. Free writing 50 words is easy, like you just did. Getting asked a question and researching to come up w/ a good answer is a lot more work. I doubt you even read all the answers tbh, you just looked at the amount someone wrote. My point is play and marty were getting mad for writing 600 words for 15 questions or so. If you even want to qualify for anything more than 1, you got to at least right more. I take quantity + quality into account. Most peoples answers are fine, it's not like a lot of them require you doing resaearch. He asks you what team you want other than yours, who is the best player, your favorite gms, etc. All your guys' answers were fine. The only difference is people like broph put a ton more amount of time to it with more lengthy and indepth answers. So if you can't write more than 700 words for a 15 question roundtable, gtfo. You wouldn't even get +2 with 600 word article + a picture of jessica alba. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 1, 2010 9:26:20 GMT -5
you shouldn't give points based on words though. When round tables get handed out it's not always a simple question and answer. Sometimes you have to research stuff or look up stuff. Free writing 50 words is easy, like you just did. Getting asked a question and researching to come up w/ a good answer is a lot more work. I doubt you even read all the answers tbh, you just looked at the amount someone wrote. My point is play and marty were getting mad for writing 600 words for 15 questions or so. If you even want to qualify for anything more than 1, you got to at least right more. I take quantity + quality into account. Most peoples answers are fine, it's not like a lot of them require you doing resaearch. He asks you what team you want other than yours, who is the best player, your favorite gms, etc. All your guys' answers were fine. The only difference is people like broph put a ton more amount of time to it with more lengthy and indepth answers. So if you can't write more than 700 words for a 15 question roundtable, gtfo. You wouldn't even get +2 with 600 word article + a picture of jessica alba. I put my paragraphs into word and I wrote only 50 less words than the people who got +2. Good job for grading on length and not actual content. I will make sure all my articles are just really really long even though they bring no quality. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 1, 2010 9:28:24 GMT -5
and lol at brophs in-depths answers knowing you ducky and the way you respond to threads you don't read shit. You read the title, saw who has more words and graded based off of that. If you really did grade based off of in-depth answers you would notice that 90% of Broph's answers were just rambling garbage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Feb 1, 2010 12:25:55 GMT -5
my point exactly...
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on Feb 1, 2010 12:34:46 GMT -5
quit bitching and move on.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 1, 2010 12:41:27 GMT -5
my mouth is completely swallowing ducky's 3 inch penis |
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Feb 1, 2010 13:14:23 GMT -5
|
|
