|
Post by Spurs GM on Feb 1, 2010 13:16:33 GMT -5
lol and they only had 10 questions to answer, we had 15 to answer..
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 1, 2010 13:17:47 GMT -5
wow @ that some of those answers were barely two sentences. Good find play, yeah ashes I don't accept my +1. Ducky needs to be consistent with his voting, I don't care if it's a "free upgrade". You can't give something to someone one day and then not give something to other guy. I do find it quite curious though that the only two West Coast GMs who answered(me and Play) got the +1.
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Feb 1, 2010 15:42:25 GMT -5
my mouth is completely swallowing ducky's 3 inch penis ROFL owned
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 1, 2010 18:55:21 GMT -5
everyone in this thread gets a +stfu
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Feb 2, 2010 2:22:41 GMT -5
everyone in this thread gets a +stfu stfu...just admit when you're wrong.
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Feb 2, 2010 2:23:14 GMT -5
My point is play and marty were getting mad for writing 600 words for 15 questions or so. If you even want to qualify for anything more than 1, you got to at least right more. I take quantity + quality into account. Most peoples answers are fine, it's not like a lot of them require you doing resaearch. He asks you what team you want other than yours, who is the best player, your favorite gms, etc. All your guys' answers were fine. The only difference is people like broph put a ton more amount of time to it with more lengthy and indepth answers. So if you can't write more than 700 words for a 15 question roundtable, gtfo. You wouldn't even get +2 with 600 word article + a picture of jessica alba. I put my paragraphs into word and I wrote only 50 less words than the people who got +2. Good job for grading on length and not actual content. I will make sure all my articles are just really really long even though they bring no quality. Well I don't like you, that's why you got a +1. Play can have a +2 if he'd like.
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 2, 2010 9:44:31 GMT -5
everyone in this thread gets a +stfu way to totally ignore the fact that ducky is the most biased person in here who doesn't even bother to read threads before answering them. gtfo out of here ashes and stop deflecting the situation with one liners.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 2, 2010 11:13:54 GMT -5
everyone in this thread gets a +stfu stfu...just admit when you're wrong. Lol how am I wrong? I've not done anything here. Plus it's obvious you do need a +stfu, I'll throw in a +gtfo too
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 2, 2010 11:25:36 GMT -5
stfu...just admit when you're wrong. Lol how am I wrong? I've not done anything here. Plus it's obvious you do need a +stfu, I'll throw in a +gtfo too yeah but you totally ignore the fact that ducky grade unbiased hell he even said "ok play I'll give you +2, maritnez you get nothing because I don't like you" then play brought up a previous article where people answered 5 less questions, and gave much shorter answers than me and Play did and they all got +2 courtesy of ducky. I really doubt it's any coincidence that the two West Coast teams got the +1 and everyone else got the +2 or better. Listen, I understand it's a freebie but I don't appreciate the bias voting. If ducky wanted to give me a +1 because he had given +1 to people with similar work that I did in the past then so be it there wouldn't be a complaint. The fact that historically he has given higher scores to people for answering much less is the problem here. Is it a headache for you that people complain? Sure, but at least make the right decision here... find someone who isn't a biased prick and actually bothers to read an entire thread and not vote or reply based off the amount of sentences he sees per person or just get rid of roundtables altogether.
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Feb 2, 2010 18:04:42 GMT -5
Lol how am I wrong? I've not done anything here. Plus it's obvious you do need a +stfu, I'll throw in a +gtfo too yeah but you totally ignore the fact that ducky grade unbiased hell he even said "ok play I'll give you +2, maritnez you get nothing because I don't like you" then play brought up a previous article where people answered 5 less questions, and gave much shorter answers than me and Play did and they all got +2 courtesy of ducky. I really doubt it's any coincidence that the two West Coast teams got the +1 and everyone else got the +2 or better. Listen, I understand it's a freebie but I don't appreciate the bias voting. If ducky wanted to give me a +1 because he had given +1 to people with similar work that I did in the past then so be it there wouldn't be a complaint. The fact that historically he has given higher scores to people for answering much less is the problem here. Is it a headache for you that people complain? Sure, but at least make the right decision here... find someone who isn't a biased prick and actually bothers to read an entire thread and not vote or reply based off the amount of sentences he sees per person or just get rid of roundtables altogether. I'm not going to read the entire thread, skimming ftw. Kinda like how I didn't read any of this post except the part you bolded.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 2, 2010 18:41:09 GMT -5
Lol how am I wrong? I've not done anything here. Plus it's obvious you do need a +stfu, I'll throw in a +gtfo too yeah but you totally ignore the fact that ducky grade unbiased hell he even said "ok play I'll give you +2, maritnez you get nothing because I don't like you" then play brought up a previous article where people answered 5 less questions, and gave much shorter answers than me and Play did and they all got +2 courtesy of ducky. I really doubt it's any coincidence that the two West Coast teams got the +1 and everyone else got the +2 or better. Listen, I understand it's a freebie but I don't appreciate the bias voting. If ducky wanted to give me a +1 because he had given +1 to people with similar work that I did in the past then so be it there wouldn't be a complaint. The fact that historically he has given higher scores to people for answering much less is the problem here. Is it a headache for you that people complain? Sure, but at least make the right decision here... find someone who isn't a biased prick and actually bothers to read an entire thread and not vote or reply based off the amount of sentences he sees per person or just get rid of roundtables altogether. You can have your +2s, good fucking lord dude, I don't care. I said it was Ducky's call. To be honest, going over it now, you, play, and tmac quite obviously didn't put very much effort into responses. It's a round table. You don't just answer a question simply, you elaborate, or at least you're supposed to. "Who's going to be in the finals?" "The Grizzlies and the Nets." or "The Grizzlies and the Bucks". I mean, really dude? Those are good answers? Who's team would you swap with? I wouldn't swap with anyone, or the Lakers they have Bron. Expand? Tell me why? Those are real answers. I just read all of broph's answers and they aren't rambling, they are very good answers. May I ask if you actually read them or did you do what Ducky did, skim and assume? Seeing so many one line and one and half line answers from you and play and you wonder why one's first inclination would be a +1? So sure, you dug around found an older article with Ducky giving different grades and some inconsistency, considering he's human, it's a pretty easy mistake, especially since with a smaller scale article and a group of smaller scale answers someone may be inclined to grade accordingly. That's fine. But to be honest, I could see you deserving a +1 just as easily as a +2, just for the lack of effort. You can't even take a quality/quantity approach to this argument because your answers were hollow and lacked substance on many occasions. So you and play got +2, I went and edited them in, but I think I'm done with roundtables. Participate out of the kindness of your hearts in the future, because no one is getting shit for them.
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Feb 2, 2010 18:55:48 GMT -5
I don't want to complain but if play and Marty get +2 so should I.
My answers were better then theirs
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Feb 2, 2010 19:01:31 GMT -5
yeah but you totally ignore the fact that ducky grade unbiased hell he even said "ok play I'll give you +2, maritnez you get nothing because I don't like you" then play brought up a previous article where people answered 5 less questions, and gave much shorter answers than me and Play did and they all got +2 courtesy of ducky. I really doubt it's any coincidence that the two West Coast teams got the +1 and everyone else got the +2 or better. Listen, I understand it's a freebie but I don't appreciate the bias voting. If ducky wanted to give me a +1 because he had given +1 to people with similar work that I did in the past then so be it there wouldn't be a complaint. The fact that historically he has given higher scores to people for answering much less is the problem here. Is it a headache for you that people complain? Sure, but at least make the right decision here... find someone who isn't a biased prick and actually bothers to read an entire thread and not vote or reply based off the amount of sentences he sees per person or just get rid of roundtables altogether. You can have your +2s, good fucking lord dude, I don't care. I said it was Ducky's call. To be honest, going over it now, you, play, and tmac quite obviously didn't put very much effort into responses. It's a round table. You don't just answer a question simply, you elaborate, or at least you're supposed to. "Who's going to be in the finals?" "The Grizzlies and the Nets." or "The Grizzlies and the Bucks". I mean, really dude? Those are good answers? Who's team would you swap with? I wouldn't swap with anyone, or the Lakers they have Bron. Expand? Tell me why? Those are real answers. I just read all of broph's answers and they aren't rambling, they are very good answers. May I ask if you actually read them or did you do what Ducky did, skim and assume? Seeing so many one line and one and half line answers from you and play and you wonder why one's first inclination would be a +1? So sure, you dug around found an older article with Ducky giving different grades and some inconsistency, considering he's human, it's a pretty easy mistake, especially since with a smaller scale article and a group of smaller scale answers someone may be inclined to grade accordingly. That's fine. But to be honest, I could see you deserving a +1 just as easily as a +2, just for the lack of effort. You can't even take a quality/quantity approach to this argument because your answers were hollow and lacked substance on many occasions. So you and play got +2, I went and edited them in, but I think I'm done with roundtables. Participate out of the kindness of your hearts in the future, because no one is getting shit for them. why would I write big ass paragraphs for? when I can just write my own big article and get a +4 or +5....gtfo and don't punish the league because ducky was grading inconsistently...
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Feb 2, 2010 19:02:48 GMT -5
stfu...just admit when you're wrong. Lol how am I wrong? I've not done anything here. Plus it's obvious you do need a +stfu, I'll throw in a +gtfo too You were wrong... no need to go on another rant though.
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Feb 2, 2010 19:03:32 GMT -5
yeah but you totally ignore the fact that ducky grade unbiased hell he even said "ok play I'll give you +2, maritnez you get nothing because I don't like you" then play brought up a previous article where people answered 5 less questions, and gave much shorter answers than me and Play did and they all got +2 courtesy of ducky. I really doubt it's any coincidence that the two West Coast teams got the +1 and everyone else got the +2 or better. Listen, I understand it's a freebie but I don't appreciate the bias voting. If ducky wanted to give me a +1 because he had given +1 to people with similar work that I did in the past then so be it there wouldn't be a complaint. The fact that historically he has given higher scores to people for answering much less is the problem here. Is it a headache for you that people complain? Sure, but at least make the right decision here... find someone who isn't a biased prick and actually bothers to read an entire thread and not vote or reply based off the amount of sentences he sees per person or just get rid of roundtables altogether. You can have your +2s, good fucking lord dude, I don't care. I said it was Ducky's call. To be honest, going over it now, you, play, and tmac quite obviously didn't put very much effort into responses. It's a round table. You don't just answer a question simply, you elaborate, or at least you're supposed to. "Who's going to be in the finals?" "The Grizzlies and the Nets." or "The Grizzlies and the Bucks". I mean, really dude? Those are good answers? Who's team would you swap with? I wouldn't swap with anyone, or the Lakers they have Bron. Expand? Tell me why? Those are real answers. I just read all of broph's answers and they aren't rambling, they are very good answers. May I ask if you actually read them or did you do what Ducky did, skim and assume? Seeing so many one line and one and half line answers from you and play and you wonder why one's first inclination would be a +1? So sure, you dug around found an older article with Ducky giving different grades and some inconsistency, considering he's human, it's a pretty easy mistake, especially since with a smaller scale article and a group of smaller scale answers someone may be inclined to grade accordingly. That's fine. But to be honest, I could see you deserving a +1 just as easily as a +2, just for the lack of effort. You can't even take a quality/quantity approach to this argument because your answers were hollow and lacked substance on many occasions. So you and play got +2, I went and edited them in, but I think I'm done with roundtables. Participate out of the kindness of your hearts in the future, because no one is getting shit for them. +1 for your long ass rant.
|
|