|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Mar 9, 2010 18:10:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 9, 2010 18:11:00 GMT -5
I'm going to figure something out for this. We obviously need better tiebreakers.
Most Conf Finalists predicted or something like that. We need to re-evaluate that.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 9, 2010 18:15:23 GMT -5
determine a break down of who gets what here than. I don't want to do it since i am a gm.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 9, 2010 18:18:56 GMT -5
but i am but a lowly commoner
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 9, 2010 18:19:13 GMT -5
i'll figure it out
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Mar 9, 2010 18:26:31 GMT -5
ok starting from next year we will have tie breakers, this year give us our points!!!! ooo great commish!!
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 9, 2010 18:29:21 GMT -5
I agree, only 3 gms should really be receiving points IMO each year. We need multiple tie breakers until we get 3 GMs on top.
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Mar 9, 2010 18:33:44 GMT -5
LOL @ this, then people complain about rating inflation.
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Mar 9, 2010 18:35:04 GMT -5
LOL @ this, then people complain about rating inflation.
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 9, 2010 18:49:18 GMT -5
LOL @ this, then people complain about rating inflation.
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 9, 2010 18:53:44 GMT -5
So are we changing it now or next year?
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Mar 9, 2010 19:09:54 GMT -5
because so many points are given out, it should be 3, 2, 1 and make sure a rule change is made. IMHO
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on Mar 9, 2010 20:03:47 GMT -5
yeah, how are there so many ties if the rules have tie breakers in them
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 9, 2010 20:10:11 GMT -5
yeah, how are there so many ties if the rules have tie breakers in them cause they never get applied
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 9, 2010 22:56:20 GMT -5
So is it still +4, +3, +2 this year?
|
|