|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 9, 2010 22:59:25 GMT -5
+2, +1, +0 seems fine to me...
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 9, 2010 23:08:15 GMT -5
gtfo
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 9, 2010 23:08:46 GMT -5
lulz
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 10, 2010 1:09:55 GMT -5
maybe i will start applying the tie breaker rules already set. lol i will do it later
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 10, 2010 1:11:21 GMT -5
+2, +1, +0 seems fine to me...
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 10, 2010 1:26:29 GMT -5
Why do we give points to teams who finished tied for "2nd" when three teams tied for 1st. Why isn't it like golf, where if three people tie for 2nd, they make the next position on the leaderboard 5th, since they finished behind 4 other people... and they split the money that would be earned by the 2nds 3rd and 4th place finishers equally. So for example this year, Don, DBW, and I would split the points that first second and third get evenly, but the rest wouldn't get points...because in reality they finished behind three people, not 1
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 10, 2010 1:39:07 GMT -5
tiebreakersssss
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 10, 2010 1:44:00 GMT -5
Why do we give points to teams who finished tied for "2nd" when three teams tied for 1st. Why isn't it like golf, where if three people tie for 2nd, they make the next position on the leaderboard 5th, since they finished behind 4 other people... and they split the money that would be earned by the 2nds 3rd and 4th place finishers equally. So for example this year, Don, DBW, and I would split the points that first second and third get evenly, but the rest wouldn't get points...because in reality they finished behind three people, not 1 jesus, a lot of your shit has pointless crap, why you ramble so much
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Mar 10, 2010 2:49:15 GMT -5
lol, yea lets start doing the tie breakers for this upcoming playoff predictions!! Dooonnntttt take my +2 awaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 10, 2010 2:50:04 GMT -5
Why do we give points to teams who finished tied for "2nd" when three teams tied for 1st. Why isn't it like golf, where if three people tie for 2nd, they make the next position on the leaderboard 5th, since they finished behind 4 other people... and they split the money that would be earned by the 2nds 3rd and 4th place finishers equally. So for example this year, Don, DBW, and I would split the points that first second and third get evenly, but the rest wouldn't get points...because in reality they finished behind three people, not 1 jesus, a lot of your shit has pointless crap, why you ramble so much want it simple? Why do we give somebody who finished behind three other people credit for second
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 10, 2010 6:06:51 GMT -5
jesus, a lot of your shit has pointless crap, why you ramble so much want it simple? Why do we give somebody who finished behind three other people credit for second BURN! broph u need to post more on c4q..
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 10, 2010 12:31:39 GMT -5
all first place gets points this time?
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 10, 2010 12:33:57 GMT -5
yea...just do...+5, +3, +2 or wtv you guys usually give, to the guys w/ 15 pts. via tiebreaker..
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 10, 2010 19:49:37 GMT -5
So whats the verdict ashes?
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 10, 2010 20:16:40 GMT -5
ashes said I decide on this one. +3,+2,+1 for this one, we'll change rules for the next.
|
|