|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Mar 13, 2010 2:14:27 GMT -5
IMO, it should be 85...I'm curious to hear every GM stance on the Hard Cap.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 13, 2010 2:28:11 GMT -5
It'd be nice, but I'm fine either way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 13, 2010 2:42:12 GMT -5
The numbers are good now but if everyone said yes then I'm fine with it
|
|
|
|
Post by zyme on Mar 13, 2010 2:43:25 GMT -5
Not a big fan, I think what it does if force team to carefully mannage their assets.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 13, 2010 2:48:24 GMT -5
I think the way it has been so far is fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 13, 2010 3:01:30 GMT -5
IMO, it should be 85...I'm curious to hear every GM stance on the Hard Cap. May I ask your reasoning? What's the difference between 45/80 and 50/85? |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 13, 2010 3:02:32 GMT -5
i like the soft cap where it is...
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 13, 2010 3:03:05 GMT -5
and the hard cap...it would suck to start paying these guys a bunch of money for just 5 mill extra in hc
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 13, 2010 3:04:09 GMT -5
I like it where it is now, makes it so five stars is tough to come by.....you have to sacrifice depth if you are going to do it....
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 13, 2010 3:05:34 GMT -5
to me the HC where iit is improves the value of late draft picks too some, cause they are cheap contracts
|
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Mar 13, 2010 3:10:08 GMT -5
IMO, it should be 85...I'm curious to hear every GM stance on the Hard Cap. May I ask your reasoning? What's the difference between 45/80 and 50/85? soft cap of 45 is fine...I feel 80 is too low for the hard cap. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 13, 2010 3:12:47 GMT -5
May I ask your reasoning? What's the difference between 45/80 and 50/85? soft cap of 45 is fine...I feel 80 is too low for the hard cap. 40 million gap between the two? Nah. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Mar 13, 2010 3:43:57 GMT -5
I had to deal with the hard cap last year and my depth suffered but I still won the championship. The year after I lost a stud due to the hard cap so yea it sucks but its good makes things difficult. Salaries are definitely rising I wish there was a softer max contract for veteran players that would solve all problems.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 13, 2010 3:50:07 GMT -5
Numbers are constant. GMs should be able to deal with it. 45/80 is where it shall remain.
|
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Mar 13, 2010 4:17:10 GMT -5
i like it the way it is
|
|
