|
Post by Contract Year on Mar 25, 2010 16:23:38 GMT -5
oh good.. guess I'm a little late
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 25, 2010 16:28:27 GMT -5
Our starters can play with anyone, but our bench is awful. In every game they blew it open in the second quarter. Guess I know what I have to work on.
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Mar 25, 2010 16:30:19 GMT -5
jesus Play you are such a little fucking bitch.
Quit ... no-one cares. Your pathetic team can be handed over to someone who can actually compete.
Whats the point in firing Mike? We have just lost a few GM's, why are we trying to get rid of ones who are active? He will pay the price through MLE/LLE or whatever, and thats the end of it.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 25, 2010 16:30:52 GMT -5
Emeka isn't matched up against Al Jeff my bad, i keep thinking 'meka is a C I think that makes it worse
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 25, 2010 16:35:25 GMT -5
well Martynas and Emeka each getting 3.7 bpg. 7.4 bpg is beast
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 25, 2010 16:39:14 GMT -5
6 Martynas Andriuskevicius C Cavaliers 3.7 7 Ben Wallace PF Nets 3.7 8 Emeka Okafor PF Cavaliers 3.7 9 Al Jefferson C Nets 3.7
well, pretty much even there.....
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 25, 2010 16:40:45 GMT -5
i guess the late season camps must've helped
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 25, 2010 16:41:01 GMT -5
'meka and gay scoring a lil more
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Mar 25, 2010 16:56:35 GMT -5
jesus Play you are such a little fucking bitch. Quit ... no-one cares. Your pathetic team can be handed over to someone who can actually compete. Whats the point in firing Mike? We have just lost a few GM's, why are we trying to get rid of ones who are active? He will pay the price through MLE/LLE or whatever, and thats the end of it. Its not that he wants him to get fired but he broke rules with no ramifications. Jazz minus Hedo could change the whole series.
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Mar 25, 2010 17:02:12 GMT -5
jesus Play you are such a little fucking bitch. Quit ... no-one cares. Your pathetic team can be handed over to someone who can actually compete. Pathetic team? lol I've been without Manu for the past 40 days...My team still won 59 games gtfo..
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 25, 2010 17:19:11 GMT -5
The bottom line is that if you go over the hard cap you're supposed to be back under in 48 hrs in the CURRENT season. However doing this at the deadline leaves for no ramifications under the CURRENT season. So if I'm ever in a pickle and want to win a title I can just go out and sign whatever VET FA I need to complete a deal to bump my team up for a playoff run. You see the point, Ducky? Our current hard cap rules are skewed and need change. I don't think Mike should be fired because of one trade nor do I think he should be allowed to keep his current team in tact. Aren't you glad you're commish now? So do you propose we make a change now? And if so, why bench his best player? Why don't I just drop his cut salaries, Taylor, and one of his other 1 year deal players? I just don't see how we can make a change to the rules right now. We definitely need to come up with better rules in the future, but my problem is making a change right now..
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Mar 25, 2010 17:23:30 GMT -5
The bottom line is that if you go over the hard cap you're supposed to be back under in 48 hrs in the CURRENT season. However doing this at the deadline leaves for no ramifications under the CURRENT season. So if I'm ever in a pickle and want to win a title I can just go out and sign whatever VET FA I need to complete a deal to bump my team up for a playoff run. You see the point, Ducky? Our current hard cap rules are skewed and need change. I don't think Mike should be fired because of one trade nor do I think he should be allowed to keep his current team in tact. Aren't you glad you're commish now? So do you propose we make a change now? And if so, why bench his best player? Why don't I just drop his cut salaries, Taylor, and one of his other 1 year deal players? I just don't see how we can make a change to the rules right now. We definitely need to come up with better rules in the future, but my problem is making a change right now.. So we are going to just fire Mike when his time is up?
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 25, 2010 17:24:24 GMT -5
The bottom line is that if you go over the hard cap you're supposed to be back under in 48 hrs in the CURRENT season. However doing this at the deadline leaves for no ramifications under the CURRENT season. So if I'm ever in a pickle and want to win a title I can just go out and sign whatever VET FA I need to complete a deal to bump my team up for a playoff run. You see the point, Ducky? Our current hard cap rules are skewed and need change. I don't think Mike should be fired because of one trade nor do I think he should be allowed to keep his current team in tact. Aren't you glad you're commish now? So do you propose we make a change now? And if so, why bench his best player? Why don't I just drop his cut salaries, Taylor, and one of his other 1 year deal players? I just don't see how we can make a change to the rules right now. We definitely need to come up with better rules in the future, but my problem is making a change right now.. thing is this hasn't happened here before, now of course timing is terrible, but, he is over the hardcap, the deal that put him over the hardcap had one main piece...Hedo Turkoglu...you can't bench his scrubs, cause the advantage of going over the HC remains in that case....by removing Hedo (overall the player that is gained from going over the HC) from play you are allowing him to keep his job, while enforcing a significant enough penalty to prevent this from happening, cause by rule this situation will almost always lead to being fired..
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Mar 25, 2010 17:26:21 GMT -5
So do you propose we make a change now? And if so, why bench his best player? Why don't I just drop his cut salaries, Taylor, and one of his other 1 year deal players? I just don't see how we can make a change to the rules right now. We definitely need to come up with better rules in the future, but my problem is making a change right now.. thing is this hasn't happened here before, now of course timing is terrible, but, he is over the hardcap, the deal that put him over the hardcap had one main piece...Hedo Turkoglu...you can't bench his scrubs, cause the advantage of going over the HC remains in that case....by removing Hedo (overall the player that is gained from going over the HC) from play you are allowing him to keep his job, while enforcing a significant enough penalty to prevent this from happening, cause by rule this situation will almost always lead to being fired.. Problem Solved
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 25, 2010 17:27:55 GMT -5
thing is this hasn't happened here before, now of course timing is terrible, but, he is over the hardcap, the deal that put him over the hardcap had one main piece...Hedo Turkoglu...you can't bench his scrubs, cause the advantage of going over the HC remains in that case....by removing Hedo (overall the player that is gained from going over the HC) from play you are allowing him to keep his job, while enforcing a significant enough penalty to prevent this from happening, cause by rule this situation will almost always lead to being fired.. Problem Solved you do realize this is what Play wanted the entire time as well.........
|
|