|
Post by Spurs GM on Mar 25, 2010 17:28:23 GMT -5
The added rule should state that if a team goes over the hard cap and the trade deadline has passed, the player they traded for should be suspended for the entire playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 25, 2010 17:29:04 GMT -5
yea, letting him play w/ hedo is just as unjust as changing the rule asap.
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Mar 25, 2010 17:30:09 GMT -5
This happened to me in bbs with no previous precedent don't see why this is any different he broke the rules plain and simple how hard is it to understand ? And I agree we should have bbs rules for hc
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 25, 2010 17:30:52 GMT -5
smh @ shaun.
Broph, I thought signing FA's is ultimately what put him over the hard cap. That's why I was saying it doesn't seem right to bench Turks. Otherwise your logic does make sense. But even if that was the case, benching Turks now would even be more unfair towards play because he already had to play 3 games with Turks playing.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 25, 2010 17:31:43 GMT -5
The added rule should state that if a team goes over the hard cap and the trade deadline has passed, the player they traded for should be suspended for the entire playoffs. rest of the season I would say, and then the firing clock starts the moment the playoffs end....
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Mar 25, 2010 17:31:43 GMT -5
smh @ shaun. Broph, I thought signing FA's is ultimately what put him over the hard cap. That's why I was saying it doesn't seem right to bench Turks. Otherwise your logic does make sense. But even if that was the case, benching Turks now would even be more unfair towards play because he already had to play 3 games with Turks playing. just 'cause it was unfair for play, doesn't mean we should multiply the unfairness by letting hedo continue to play.
|
|
|
Post by Spurs GM on Mar 25, 2010 17:35:04 GMT -5
yah im fine with the benching now...my team wasnt winning shit this year anyway lol
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Mar 25, 2010 17:36:17 GMT -5
The added rule should state that if a team goes over the hard cap and the trade deadline has passed, the player they traded for should be suspended for the entire playoffs. rest of the season I would say, and then the firing clock starts the moment the playoffs end.... OK let's say I implement this rule. That still doesn't help decide if the GM gets his normal penalty or not. Because in Mike's case, if we JUST followed the rules, 72 hours would have passed, so he should be fired. Obviously that needs fixing also. So I'm going to add this rule as well. If a GM goes over the hard cap after the trade deadline and 48 hours has passed, he will be penalized like normal. However, the additional 24 hours won't be initiated until lotto has simmed. Would that be fair?
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Mar 25, 2010 17:36:36 GMT -5
Re-sim
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Mar 25, 2010 17:36:33 GMT -5
noooo this also has major ramifications on those that picked the Jazz to take out the title this year in the predictions!!! I object!!! Objection sustained
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 25, 2010 17:37:08 GMT -5
smh @ shaun. Broph, I thought signing FA's is ultimately what put him over the hard cap. That's why I was saying it doesn't seem right to bench Turks. Otherwise your logic does make sense. But even if that was the case, benching Turks now would even be more unfair towards play because he already had to play 3 games with Turks playing. just 'cause it was unfair for play, doesn't mean we should multiply the unfairness by letting hedo continue to play. Play accepted his team was screwed, but he is correct in saying that Hedo should be out either way....one more thing I would say is that in the event that somebody makes a deadline deal that results in them being unable to fill their roster without going over the HC, the player acquired in the trade is suspended, not the FA
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Mar 25, 2010 17:38:08 GMT -5
Re-sim I concur !!!
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 25, 2010 17:38:23 GMT -5
really wouldn't be a rule change, more of a rule clarification
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 25, 2010 17:39:04 GMT -5
noooo this also has major ramifications on those that picked the Jazz to take out the title this year in the predictions!!! I object!!! Objection sustained you picked mike to win the title?
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Mar 25, 2010 17:40:02 GMT -5
noooo this also has major ramifications on those that picked the Jazz to take out the title this year in the predictions!!! I object!!! Objection sustained you picked mike to win the title? Stranger things have happened ;D
|
|