|
|
Post by martinez on Mar 12, 2009 12:10:29 GMT -5
Sacramento trades:
Harper
New York Knicks trade:
Kenny Smith
Mahorn (Filler) -
'96 and 97' 1sts
|
|
|
|
Post by mops on Mar 12, 2009 12:14:29 GMT -5
WOW WHY ARE YOU GIVING UP 2 FIRSTS?
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Mar 12, 2009 12:16:32 GMT -5
harper is a stud
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 12, 2009 12:22:50 GMT -5
Yucky for Harper. Nice deal Dan.
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Mar 12, 2009 12:24:40 GMT -5
It is interesting. Who will man the point for the Knicks?
Harper is nice though.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 12, 2009 12:26:23 GMT -5
Hmm. Good deal for the Knicks, but it does leave them without a point. There are a few guys available on the market if Dan is hustling, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Mar 12, 2009 12:26:46 GMT -5
Yucky for Harper. Nice deal Dan. I should have taken your incredible offer instead |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Mar 12, 2009 12:28:19 GMT -5
he might get another one of my players
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 12, 2009 13:02:42 GMT -5
I like Nique and your 97 more then this. At least you get one of your picks back, and Nique has lots of value too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Mar 12, 2009 13:58:28 GMT -5
Dan needs Armstrong or Haywood
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 12, 2009 14:32:02 GMT -5
Sacramento trades: Harper New York Knicks trade: Kenny Smith Mahorn (Filler) - '96 and 97' 1sts I agree. Duo of Miller and Harper is sick. I was thinking of starting reggie at the 1, but I might just get a point guard. Thanks marty. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 12, 2009 14:45:48 GMT -5
You definitely need a PG. Reggie won't cut it.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 12, 2009 14:46:57 GMT -5
stranger things have happened.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 12, 2009 14:49:36 GMT -5
Heh, it's not like I know his ratings or anything.  |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Mar 13, 2009 9:04:10 GMT -5
I like Nique and your 97 more then this. At least you get one of your picks back, and Nique has lots of value too. I disagree. Dominque is harder to move becasue of the age than Kenny Smith and Smith has some surprinsingly good looking ratings. '97 is way to far ahead to even consider that. |
|
