|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Aug 26, 2010 16:40:51 GMT -5
lol, this shit is short as fuck. It's not even hard. Just go over the rosters once. The writing is the hardest part and he didn't do much of that. he went over every damn roster, gave two all rookie teams, 3 all teams, 2 all defensive teams, and even some of his own awards,,,come on now, my shit gets a 5 and this is getting fours? easy 5 here it really isn't that hard. You just go over every damn roster. I do that for every article i do. |
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on Aug 26, 2010 16:41:18 GMT -5
lol, this shit is short as fuck. It's not even hard. Just go over the rosters once. The writing is the hardest part and he didn't do much of that. he went over every damn roster, gave two all rookie teams, 3 all teams, 2 all defensive teams, and even some of his own awards,,,come on now, my shit gets a 5 and this is getting fours? easy 5 here yeah, nice job |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Aug 26, 2010 16:41:51 GMT -5
lol, this shit is short as fuck. It's not even hard. Just go over the rosters once. The writing is the hardest part and he didn't do much of that. Just go over the rosters once?  I really don't get the article ranking in this league. How is this different than the draft scrimmage article? he had to calculate the stats. Wtf did you do? copy the stats off the roster page? |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Aug 26, 2010 16:44:20 GMT -5
fuckin act like 4 is a horrible grade.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 26, 2010 16:44:28 GMT -5
Just go over the rosters once? I really don't get the article ranking in this league. How is this different than the draft scrimmage article? he had to calculate the stats. Wtf did you do? copy the stats off the roster page? Spreadsheets dude...I voted a 4 for my own article |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Aug 26, 2010 16:45:32 GMT -5
he had to calculate the stats. Wtf did you do? copy the stats off the roster page? Spreadsheets dude...I voted a 4 for my own article lol, how the fuck am i sposed to know. I would've give that a 4 also. |
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Aug 26, 2010 16:49:44 GMT -5
IDK.
I wrote an article 3 times this length and it was quality stuff and I got a freakin 4.
This is good stuff, but I'm tempted to give a 4 because the whole article is based on preseason
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 26, 2010 16:51:16 GMT -5
so Its still a hell of an article
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Aug 26, 2010 16:52:04 GMT -5
Broph shouldn't have gotten a 5 for the rookie thing. Doesn't take mich work with a spreadsheet. You enter the stats and excel does the rest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 26, 2010 16:52:42 GMT -5
Broph shouldn't have gotten a 5 for the rookie thing. Doesn't take mich work with a spreadsheet. You enter the stats and excel does the rest. yep....pretty much, which is why I laughed at the getting a 5 |
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Aug 26, 2010 16:54:10 GMT -5
he used no creativity whatsoever. He just grabbed the guys with the best pre-season stats and ranked the stats instead of the players.
It's like doing a power rankings solely based off standings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 26, 2010 16:55:07 GMT -5
lol and awards are not supposed to be based off stats?
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Aug 26, 2010 16:56:37 GMT -5
J, convince me to vote a 5 instead of 4
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Aug 26, 2010 16:57:05 GMT -5
I'm leaning toward a 4. Styro is making a good point
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Aug 26, 2010 17:00:14 GMT -5
lol and awards are not supposed to be based off stats? regular season stats over 82 games sure. A pre-season stat with dc's being based off cpu's, no. |
|
