|
Post by 2019 Champs on Aug 30, 2010 20:54:21 GMT -5
where should I +5 Rasheed when I get it? I am thinking jumpshot or inside, his handles are shit and I really don't think a +5 there is going to make a difference. thoughts? meh his handles are a big problem, unless you never plan on him being a PG, or touching the PG spot...and even then its a worry I am just thinking about if I can live with the turnovers if he is a stud scorer. I think I want him to be a 2 but if his turnovers somewhat take care of themselves down the road maybe I could turn him into a point.... he can't run the point turning it over 4+ times a game though, and will +5 there really make as much of a difference if I +5 his scoring, I'm not so sure.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 20:54:44 GMT -5
STEVENSON IS NOT A WING
he is really only good as a PG
also i would be more worried about this
Ricky Rubio PG 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0
|
|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Aug 30, 2010 20:55:06 GMT -5
this prince dude always seems to be in the middle of these 50 post arguments god damn.
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Aug 30, 2010 20:55:39 GMT -5
What if he's listed as a backup PG on the depth chart and he ends up starting the game as a PG because the starter was hurt in the previous game, will the world now end because Tomas is starting at point guard? Either that, or the Jazz actually try and win for more than one year. Both situations are likely to never happen. first off, you're a fucking moron for trying to change the subject and I'd try to win if my players didn't fucking leave asshole Second, players getting hurt happens all the time. Using words like "never" and "always" will always make you lose in any debate.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Aug 30, 2010 20:55:42 GMT -5
sucks i get one of two players to have a "restriction" that wasnt actually called a restriction
|
|
|
Post by House on Aug 30, 2010 20:55:46 GMT -5
it was a player restriction Was it a player restriction or a play restriction? Because I doubt the player actually called someone and said, "you can't play me at point guard." Does it really matter? You didn't spend the time necessary to make the file. Play did and he could do whatever the hell he wanted to do with it.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 20:56:04 GMT -5
lol
Josh Smith Nets** Blurred Vision 7 Austin Charles Patch Nets** Stiff Neck 4
My injuries even sound like tanking injuries
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 20:56:52 GMT -5
meh his handles are a big problem, unless you never plan on him being a PG, or touching the PG spot...and even then its a worry I am just thinking about if I can live with the turnovers if he is a stud scorer. I think I want him to be a 2 but if his turnovers somewhat take care of themselves down the road maybe I could turn him into a point.... he can't run the point turning it over 4+ times a game though, and will +5 there really make as much of a difference if I +5 his scoring, I'm not so sure. if scoring is your choice, then I would definitely go with Jump Shot, Jump shot for a wing is probably the most important rating
|
|
|
Post by House on Aug 30, 2010 20:57:17 GMT -5
Either that, or the Jazz actually try and win for more than one year. Both situations are likely to never happen. first off, you're a fucking moron for trying to change the subject and I'd try to win if my players didn't fucking leave asshole Second, players getting hurt happens all the time. Using words like "never" and "always" will always make you lose in any debate. But, see, I called this back during hte whole first debacle. You were trying to top 10 protect this year's first and scram someone by giving it to JAH, which I notice would be rather convenient if a few people decided to leave via FA and your team hit the shitter again. Would delay the picks for Jah for awhile, which was crap. I just didn't like that whole situation at all.
|
|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Aug 30, 2010 20:57:33 GMT -5
how would jump shot be more important than 3 point shot?
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Aug 30, 2010 20:57:53 GMT -5
Was it a player restriction or a play restriction? Because I doubt the player actually called someone and said, "you can't play me at point guard." Does it really matter? You didn't spend the time necessary to make the file. Play did and he could do whatever the hell he wanted to do with it. Sure it matter because if someone gets upgraded enough to play well at point guard, why should he be restricted at that position?
|
|
|
Post by House on Aug 30, 2010 20:57:59 GMT -5
Sweet, 6,100 posts. +5! What to upgrade Perry with, what to upgrade? No bullshit +5s either Broph.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 20:58:42 GMT -5
sucks i get one of two players to have a "restriction" that wasnt actually called a restriction I dont get what part of only wants to play SG, will not play PG is not calling a restriction...Shabazz I would be a bit miffed about if I was Iflip, cause I dont remember seeing a restriction for him til he tried to play him at PG, but, Tomas was set that way
|
|
|
Post by House on Aug 30, 2010 20:58:49 GMT -5
Does it really matter? You didn't spend the time necessary to make the file. Play did and he could do whatever the hell he wanted to do with it. Sure it matter because if someone gets upgraded enough to play well at point guard, why should he be restricted at that position? What? What are you even getting at there? The team is upgrading him. He could be an A+ handles and an A+ defense at PG, and yet he himself restricted it. He doesn't care.
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Aug 30, 2010 20:58:50 GMT -5
first off, you're a fucking moron for trying to change the subject and I'd try to win if my players didn't fucking leave asshole Second, players getting hurt happens all the time. Using words like "never" and "always" will always make you lose in any debate. But, see, I called this back during hte whole first debacle. You were trying to top 10 protect this year's first and scram someone by giving it to JAH, which I notice would be rather convenient if a few people decided to leave via FA and your team hit the shitter again. Would delay the picks for Jah for awhile, which was crap. I just didn't like that whole situation at all. No, the way it turned it was how I originally wanted but JAH was insisting on wanting the 2017 pick now instead.
|
|