|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Aug 30, 2010 20:58:59 GMT -5
don't upgrade him save it.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Aug 30, 2010 20:59:30 GMT -5
don't upgrade him save it. ... why? |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 21:00:03 GMT -5
how would jump shot be more important than 3 point shot? Jump Shot plays a nice part in Free throws, and if a guy has 100 3 point shot, but 5 Jump Shot, he shoots a normal amount of threes, but, his 3 point percentage is typically around 28%, read into it what you want |
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Aug 30, 2010 21:00:06 GMT -5
Sure it matter because if someone gets upgraded enough to play well at point guard, why should he be restricted at that position? What? What are you even getting at there? The team is upgrading him. He could be an A+ handles and an A+ defense at PG, and yet he himself restricted it. He doesn't care. If play restricted it, then you're right. But why should it matter if the player restricted it, the player doesn't run the team, the GM does. |
|
|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Aug 30, 2010 21:00:08 GMT -5
he is already the best player in the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Aug 30, 2010 21:01:18 GMT -5
What? What are you even getting at there? The team is upgrading him. He could be an A+ handles and an A+ defense at PG, and yet he himself restricted it. He doesn't care. If play restricted it, then you're right. But why should it matter if the player restricted it, the player doesn't run the team, the GM does. ... The whole POINT is that play restricted it. That's my point here. He wrote it so that the player refused to play there, and that's that. BOTH Play and the Player restrict it. |
|
|
|
Post by House on Aug 30, 2010 21:01:36 GMT -5
he is already the best player in the league. Rudy Gay still holds that title IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 21:02:01 GMT -5
What? What are you even getting at there? The team is upgrading him. He could be an A+ handles and an A+ defense at PG, and yet he himself restricted it. He doesn't care. If play restricted it, then you're right. But why should it matter if the player restricted it, the player doesn't run the team, the GM does. but the player can refuse to play |
|
|
|
Post by House on Aug 30, 2010 21:02:38 GMT -5
If play restricted it, then you're right. But why should it matter if the player restricted it, the player doesn't run the team, the GM does. but the player can refuse to play This is true too. Now where the FUCK am I going to upgrade Perry? Handles? Rebounds? I'm leaning rebounds or somewhere else on offense. |
|
|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Aug 30, 2010 21:02:40 GMT -5
meh tomato tomato.
|
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Aug 30, 2010 21:03:07 GMT -5
If play restricted it, then you're right. But why should it matter if the player restricted it, the player doesn't run the team, the GM does. but the player can refuse to play Why and how can the player refuse to play, he's part of a computer simulated program. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 21:03:40 GMT -5
What? What are you even getting at there? The team is upgrading him. He could be an A+ handles and an A+ defense at PG, and yet he himself restricted it. He doesn't care. If play restricted it, then you're right. But why should it matter if the player restricted it, the player doesn't run the team, the GM does. LOL this is funny shit anyway, did Tomas Santoransky really tell Play that he wouldnt play PG? what the fuck do you think...he didnt, no chance in hell, so obviously Play made the restriction up as a reason to keep him from playing PG, Your argument is terrible |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Aug 30, 2010 21:03:46 GMT -5
sucks i get one of two players to have a "restriction" that wasnt actually called a restriction I dont get what part of only wants to play SG, will not play PG is not calling a restriction...Shabazz I would be a bit miffed about if I was Iflip, cause I dont remember seeing a restriction for him til he tried to play him at PG, but, Tomas was set that way ya there should have been better wording for shabazz, but that's how it's going to be he can take solace in the fact that shabazz will probably be a sick SG |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 21:04:51 GMT -5
I dont get what part of only wants to play SG, will not play PG is not calling a restriction...Shabazz I would be a bit miffed about if I was Iflip, cause I dont remember seeing a restriction for him til he tried to play him at PG, but, Tomas was set that way ya there should have been better wording for shabazz, but that's how it's going to be he can take solace in the fact that shabazz will probably be a sick SG give him a +1.....and "probably", lol |
|
|
|
Post by 2019 Champs on Aug 30, 2010 21:05:05 GMT -5
Rasheed is winning roty one way or another.
|
|
