|
|
Post by ashes on Aug 30, 2010 19:15:43 GMT -5
Gary Harris
for
2017 Kings 1st
|
|
|
|
Post by Before I'm Gone on Aug 30, 2010 19:37:17 GMT -5
cool deal
|
|
|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Aug 30, 2010 21:25:37 GMT -5
He tured down Rubio but took Harris? lol
|
|
|
|
Post by dreamweaver on Aug 30, 2010 21:49:05 GMT -5
Clippers accept. After trading Iverson, we didn't really have a developing SF so Harris fills that void. Plus, that Kings pick wasn't going to be a lotto pick really unless the Kings actually acquired it. Now they can officially rebuild. Therefore, we'll take our chances on Harris.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clifford "Poop" Harris on Aug 30, 2010 21:49:50 GMT -5
probably could have gotten rubio
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Aug 30, 2010 21:56:56 GMT -5
Lame deal for the Clips
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 21:59:07 GMT -5
He shoulda taken Goodluck, or come to me, cause I really want Goodluck
|
|
|
|
Post by dreamweaver on Aug 30, 2010 22:15:08 GMT -5
Shoulda, coulda, woulda...such an easy thing to say
I traded for a PG already in the offseason, so I obviously don't need another PG. Granted now, Rubio > McCallum but how the hell was I supposed to know Rubio would go up in TC? I don't need Goodluck because he's a C and I already have a C.
Warriors, you should really worry about your CY instead of taking dumps on peoples deals.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Aug 30, 2010 22:18:11 GMT -5
lol shots fired
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 22:23:32 GMT -5
Shoulda, coulda, woulda...such an easy thing to say I traded for a PG already in the offseason, so I obviously don't need another PG. Granted now, Rubio > McCallum but how the hell was I supposed to know Rubio would go up in TC? I don't need Goodluck because he's a C and I already have a C. Warriors, you should really worry about your CY instead of taking dumps on peoples deals. cause Goodluck couldnt play PF...or Drummond? cause you still appear to have a large hole at PF..A Goodluck and Drummond front court would have been sick, you could easily have slid Drummond to the PF role, and started Goodluck at C. Rubio only went up on inside, however, he really hasnt been upgraded, odds are good you could have gotten far more than what you would have had to give up for Rubio... |
|
|
|
Post by aar on Aug 30, 2010 22:23:46 GMT -5
Shoulda, coulda, woulda...such an easy thing to say I traded for a PG already in the offseason, so I obviously don't need another PG. Granted now, Rubio > McCallum but how the hell was I supposed to know Rubio would go up in TC? I don't need Goodluck because he's a C and I already have a C. Warriors, you should really worry about your CY instead of taking dumps on peoples deals. Says the guy who hasn't been around for long enough to experience a CY |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 22:26:07 GMT -5
also, at the time it was first offered to you, you didnt actually have a Center...any team with Bosh Rubio Wagner, Oden was gonna be fine, Bosh is a stud (yes he isnt a bust now Styro, I take it all back) Rubio is a really nice PG, and Wagner can still play at his age too, Oden is a nice rebounder and defender....that team wasnt lotto.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Aug 30, 2010 22:28:01 GMT -5
Shoulda, coulda, woulda...such an easy thing to say I traded for a PG already in the offseason, so I obviously don't need another PG. Granted now, Rubio > McCallum but how the hell was I supposed to know Rubio would go up in TC? I don't need Goodluck because he's a C and I already have a C. Warriors, you should really worry about your CY instead of taking dumps on peoples deals. cause Goodluck couldnt play PF...or Drummond? cause you still appear to have a large hole at PF..A Goodluck and Drummond front court would have been sick, you could easily have slid Drummond to the PF role, and started Goodluck at C. Rubio only went up on inside, however, he really hasnt been upgraded, odds are good you could have gotten far more than what you would have had to give up for Rubio... to be fair, i'll just say i wouldn't play drummond or goodluck at anything but Center, but you guys can figure that out for yourselves |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Aug 30, 2010 22:35:10 GMT -5
cause Goodluck couldnt play PF...or Drummond? cause you still appear to have a large hole at PF..A Goodluck and Drummond front court would have been sick, you could easily have slid Drummond to the PF role, and started Goodluck at C. Rubio only went up on inside, however, he really hasnt been upgraded, odds are good you could have gotten far more than what you would have had to give up for Rubio... to be fair, i'll just say i wouldn't play drummond or goodluck at anything but Center, but you guys can figure that out for yourselves Well fine then, but that still doesnt change the fact that Goodluck was on the market for the pick before he got Drummond.....and I won a title with Millsap at Center... |
|
|
|
Post by aar on Aug 30, 2010 22:38:11 GMT -5
Drummond is better suited at PF IMO
|
|
