|
|
Post by martinez on May 7, 2009 8:15:33 GMT -5
Kings trade: 2028 1st
Wolves trade: Nothing
This fulfills the owed 1st by 1998.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trunks on May 7, 2009 10:06:52 GMT -5
It's a pick by 1998 not by 2028.. even if u were trying to be funny, it doesn't work that way.
It could be any pick between now and 98.. thats how it works.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 7, 2009 10:19:41 GMT -5
No, by 1998 means I owe you a 1st by 1998.
If you wanted a first in the years up to 1998 you should have worded it that way.
It's not my fault you people don't know how to write.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 7, 2009 10:20:00 GMT -5
sorry you're wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trunks on May 7, 2009 10:22:58 GMT -5
Alright.. ashes could u clear things up?
Heh thanks to you(martinez) this shit will probably be getting rid of. dipshit.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 7, 2009 10:23:26 GMT -5
Fine by me, this deal is done though.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on May 7, 2009 10:28:58 GMT -5
No, by 1998 means I owe you a 1st by 1998. If you wanted a first in the years up to 1998 you should have worded it that way. It's not my fault you people don't know how to write. Martinez, the wording as you stated it means that he gets a pick between now and 98, that's how it's been done... |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 7, 2009 10:31:44 GMT -5
An owed 1st by 1998. The only thing this means is that I need to give him a first by the time the year 1998 comes around. This does not have any restrictions on the year of the pick that is to be given
An owed 1st before or in-between the year 1998. This statement now implies that I owe him a first before/on 1998 and no later
You're really going to argue this really? Look at the other trade threads where people specificially bolded their wording. Not my fault you agreed to this.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 7, 2009 10:33:31 GMT -5
lol this is common sense guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 7, 2009 10:34:06 GMT -5
Yea, you should be lucky your getting a pick in 2028 and not 3028.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on May 7, 2009 10:34:48 GMT -5
An owed 1st by 1998. The only thing this means is that I need to give him a first before 1998. This does not have any restrictions on the year the pick is to be givenAn owed 1st before or in-between the year 1998. This statement now implies that I owe him a first before/on 1998 and no laterYou're really going to argue this really? Look at the other trade threads where people specificially bolded their wording. Not my fault you agreed to this. Two things why it won't happen: 1) Isn't this part of the deal that doesn't work? 2) Use common sense, this isn't going to work, you can try to bend the rule on it, but it has to be between now and then, that's the implications. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 7, 2009 10:36:43 GMT -5
An owed 1st by 1998. The only thing this means is that I need to give him a first before 1998. This does not have any restrictions on the year the pick is to be givenAn owed 1st before or in-between the year 1998. This statement now implies that I owe him a first before/on 1998 and no laterYou're really going to argue this really? Look at the other trade threads where people specificially bolded their wording. Not my fault you agreed to this. Two things why it won't happen: 1) Isn't this part of the deal that doesn't work? 2) Use common sense, this isn't going to work, you can try to bend the rule on it, but it has to be between now and then, that's the implications. 1) This is part of a deal that needs to be worked out, why the fuck wouldn't that deal work? 2)Use common sense, why wouldn't this work? What rules am I bending when I see no rules against this as their shouldn't be. Re-read what I said and how it makes any sense. Why the fuck do you think Seattle clearly bolded in his trade with you An owed 1st IN 1998 not by. |
|
|
|
Post by House on May 7, 2009 10:37:58 GMT -5
Because we had been talking about doing the BY thing, and we decided to just do one IN 98, so I asked him to bold it to make it clear that that's what I was giving him.
|
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 7, 2009 10:38:26 GMT -5
Martinez, what is stopping you from giving a pick in 3028?
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 7, 2009 10:38:28 GMT -5
we should banned owed picks.
|
|
