|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 18:07:04 GMT -5
If Grant's one of the 3 options, I can understand the TOs. If he's a non-option, then there is a problem. He's not an option but he handles the ball a lot. That shouldn't really matter. |
|
|
|
Post by House on May 17, 2009 18:08:02 GMT -5
Maybe make him the 3rd option then.
I dunno, maybe he needs to have all women taken out of the arena. He apparently is throwing the ball into the crowd a bit too much.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 17, 2009 18:08:54 GMT -5
Looks like the whole article was AST/TO ratio. Right but he ranked the worst in reverse order as Grant has a better assist to turnover ratio than Price and Douglas as well as other point guards he didn't mention. Except he doesn't have a better AST/TO ration than either Price or Douglas. |
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 17, 2009 18:18:54 GMT -5
Right but he ranked the worst in reverse order as Grant has a better assist to turnover ratio than Price and Douglas as well as other point guards he didn't mention. Except he doesn't have a better AST/TO ration than either Price or Douglas. What I tried telling him when he told me that Grant had a better assist to turnover ratio than AJ. Would you mind telling us what you believe his assist to turnover ratio is and how exactly you found it arroyo? |
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 18:20:31 GMT -5
Right but he ranked the worst in reverse order as Grant has a better assist to turnover ratio than Price and Douglas as well as other point guards he didn't mention. Except he doesn't have a better AST/TO ration than either Price or Douglas. Didn't mean to include those two players but rather other players in the league that he didn't include. |
|
|
|
Post by DB on May 17, 2009 18:20:53 GMT -5
good article... adams is beasting it up as well
Michael Adams PG 32 38.5 16.8 3.9 10.1 1.7 0.1 3.3 .481 .824 .304
siccck
|
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 18:22:36 GMT -5
Except he doesn't have a better AST/TO ration than either Price or Douglas. What I tried telling him when he told me that Grant had a better assist to turnover ratio than AJ. Would you mind telling us what you believe his assist to turnover ratio is and how exactly you found it arroyo? Actually you shouldn't lie in this case because I never said Grant was better. I said, "...both have an approximate 2/1 assist to turnover ratio. While AJ's performance is slightly better..." Hmmmm |
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on May 17, 2009 18:29:42 GMT -5
while we have you all here in this thread, be sure to check out my power rankings threads and vote  |
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 17, 2009 18:29:54 GMT -5
What I tried telling him when he told me that Grant had a better assist to turnover ratio than AJ. Would you mind telling us what you believe his assist to turnover ratio is and how exactly you found it arroyo? Actually you shouldn't lie in this case because I never said Grant was better. I said, "...both have an approximate 2/1 assist to turnover ratio. While AJ's performance is slightly better..." Hmmmm  |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 17, 2009 18:33:00 GMT -5
But they aren't both approximately 2/1. Grant's is 2.13 while AJ's is 2.86. That's a huge difference. I'm not arguing who is better or which is better for a team, but in the terms of this ranking of AST/TO ratio, AJ is significantly better than Grant. There's no denying that.
And if you didn't mean to include Price and Douglas, which is odd since you said he skewed the ranking regarding the three, which starting PGs' AST/TO ration out there is worse than Grant's?
|
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 18:35:48 GMT -5
But they aren't both approximately 2/1. Grant's is 2.13 while AJ's is 2.86. That's a huge difference. I'm not arguing who is better or which is better for a team, but in the terms of this ranking of AST/TO ratio, AJ is significantly better than Grant. There's no denying that. And if you didn't mean to include Price and Douglas, which is odd since you said he skewed the ranking regarding the three, which starting PGs' AST/TO ration out there is worse than Grant's? I'm not denying the difference but they they are both in approximately 2/1. And the bullets named the two and he questioned, who is worse in the pm. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 17, 2009 18:38:14 GMT -5
Ok, so his rankings are entirely accurate. What were you trying to say?
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 17, 2009 18:41:25 GMT -5
Ok, so his rankings are entirely accurate. What were you trying to say? Didn't you know that the assists and turnovers on the roster page are false? |
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 18:51:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on May 17, 2009 18:55:34 GMT -5
I'm still waiting on what you believe to be Grant's real assist-to-turnover ratio since mine is apparently false.
|
|
